Comments
Sort by recent activity
@Dan_J well, I updated to 4.2.0.3722 recently and now I am unable to recreate the issue. I am guessing it was directly or indirectly fixed by whatever changed in the recent release. / comments
@Dan_J well, I updated to 4.2.0.3722 recently and now I am unable to recreate the issue. I am guessing it was directly or indirectly fixed by whatever changed in the recent release.
@Jon_Kirkwood We would use this information when trying to determine the impact of deprecating a field in table, view, stored procedure, etc or implementing breaking changes to a field. Using the previous example, if I was going to remove the Attribute field from Table A, currently all I know is what objects depend on Table A, but I have to do further analysis to see if any of the dependent objects actually use the Attribute field in order to remove it. Same thing goes if I were to change the field definition for the Attribute field. This takes dependency tracking a step deeper to get a better picture into what exact fields do things depend on within an object. Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks! --Adam / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood We would use this information when trying to determine the impact of deprecating a field in table, view, stored procedure, etc or implementing breaking changes to a field. Using the ...
@Jon_Kirkwood Would you be able to provide some instructions on how you were able to import this into Excel? I tried something similar, but it was not intuitive and I couldn't get anything that was very useful without a lot of effort. So if there's something I was overlooking, I am open to suggestions for a workaround until an Excel output could be possible. Thanks! --Adam / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood Would you be able to provide some instructions on how you were able to import this into Excel? I tried something similar, but it was not intuitive and I couldn't get anything that w...
@Jon_KirkwoodIs there any way to add some information about how "relative importance" is determined? Is there some calculation that can be provided or some sort of detail into what factors are taken into account? / comments
@Jon_KirkwoodIs there any way to add some information about how "relative importance" is determined? Is there some calculation that can be provided or some sort of detail into what factors are tak...
I think there was a slight miss here. I know I stated specifically PDF, but you should probably also fix the XML export as it doesn't respect the hidden objects either. It includes everything as well and should only include the hidden ones as well. I am not sure if you want to track this as a separate bug, or open a new one? I would confirm that the PDF export is working as expected now though. Thanks! / comments
I think there was a slight miss here. I know I stated specifically PDF, but you should probably also fix the XML export as it doesn't respect the hidden objects either. It includes everything as ...
@SebT I was trying to reproduce this, but haven't had any luck. I am using SSMS 20.2.30.0 and Dependency Tracker 3.3.32.5437. What are you using? / comments
@SebT I was trying to reproduce this, but haven't had any luck. I am using SSMS 20.2.30.0 and Dependency Tracker 3.3.32.5437. What are you using?
@Jon_Kirkwood Good catch! The copy/paste trick does work. Thanks for the suggestion and also for passing this along to the developers to address this as a bug. / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood Good catch! The copy/paste trick does work. Thanks for the suggestion and also for passing this along to the developers to address this as a bug.
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks! I will wait and see if your team is able to address these changes. / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks! I will wait and see if your team is able to address these changes.
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks for passing this along. I will wait to hear what you find out from your team. / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks for passing this along. I will wait to hear what you find out from your team.
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks for digging into the history on this one. If that is the case, the documentation should be updated to identify that the schema tag is not recognized. Since there is considerable documentation about this feature it leads to confusion. Could that be updated? / comments
@Jon_Kirkwood thanks for digging into the history on this one. If that is the case, the documentation should be updated to identify that the schema tag is not recognized. Since there is considera...