Comments
Sort by recent activity
Ah - in that case you'll just need to create the Client sub key first (under RedGate). / comments
Ah - in that case you'll just need to create the Client sub key first (under RedGate).
So it's still not downloading any activity history for a server?
There's a way to turn on some verbose logging in the V6 client. If you goto the registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Red Gate\SQL Backup\Client
Then create a string value called "FullLogging" with the value of "1". Then some logs will appear in the local application data folder, under Red Gate\Logs\SQL Backup.
If you could set that and then send the latest log to backup.prerelease@red-gate.com please? / comments
So it's still not downloading any activity history for a server?
There's a way to turn on some verbose logging in the V6 client. If you goto the registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Red Gate\S...
Yes please. I found an issue where the selected server might not get updates, but restarting should always fix it.
Try deleting it and then see if it behaves and we can take it from there.
Thanks / comments
Yes please. I found an issue where the selected server might not get updates, but restarting should always fix it.
Try deleting it and then see if it behaves and we can take it from there.
Thanks
If you click on a different server and then back to the first one does the history then appear? / comments
If you click on a different server and then back to the first one does the history then appear?
Hi Luis,
If you mean the UI then I'm afraid you can only have one version. They use the same client side cache and V6 needs to upgrade the V5 one before it can run, which then means V5 can't use it.
If you reinstall and run V5 then it will work, but it will delete the client side cache and reload the data from the servers. This works fine as I've been doing it lots, but it can take a while if you have a lot of data to get.
For the server components then you can run the backup 5 on one SQL Server instance and backup 6 on another on the same machine, but only one version per instance of course.
Hope that helps [image] / comments
Hi Luis,
If you mean the UI then I'm afraid you can only have one version. They use the same client side cache and V6 needs to upgrade the V5 one before it can run, which then means V5 can't use i...
The next day you say? In that case (if they are still showing) could you run the query exec master..sqbstatus
And see if that returns any output please? / comments
The next day you say? In that case (if they are still showing) could you run the queryexec master..sqbstatus
And see if that returns any output please?
But they are still showing in the V6 UI? even after a restart?
Sorry to check, it's just that i'm at a loss as to how they are getting there if that query has no output. The UI keeps no record of the in progress jobs between sessions, and the data only comes from runing that query. Or at least I thought it did :? / comments
But they are still showing in the V6 UI? even after a restart?
Sorry to check, it's just that i'm at a loss as to how they are getting there if that query has no output. The UI keeps no record of t...
If you click off a server and back on it do the extra "in progress" items vanish? I have recently fixed a refresh bug in this area so I'm just wondering if this is the same or a new one.
Also be aware that when using VERIFY this can mean the actual backup is done (and so appears on the activity history tab) but the verify is the bit still "in progress" and when that completes it will update the activity history with the results. / comments
If you click off a server and back on it do the extra "in progress" items vanish? I have recently fixed a refresh bug in this area so I'm just wondering if this is the same or a new one.
Also be a...
RBA wrote:
I've just had a chat with Nigel about this. We're considering this for a future release - it isn't too hard a change to make [image] .
The actual change is relatively easy, but the original implementation may have used a lot of assumptions that the dialog is modal. For example it's possible the a user could delete a server from the list that the dialog is using. So it's all these knock-on effects that need to be found and handled, which is why it's not as straight forward as it sounds. / comments
RBA wrote:
I've just had a chat with Nigel about this. We're considering this for a future release - it isn't too hard a change to make .
The actual change is relatively easy, but the original ...
williamd wrote:
1. Window scope lock (don't know if that is the right terminology)
I don't like the fact that the pop-up windows lock you in their scope.
Example: Start a standard manual backup. The popup windows stops you from doing anything behind it (try starting another backup window).
The wizard part where you make all the selections is modal, but you should be able to do other stuff whilst the backup is actually running. The task in progress dialog can be hidden/minimized and the task carries on running (you can retrieve the dialog by clicking in the bottom right of the application where it says how many tasks are running) / comments
williamd wrote:
1. Window scope lock (don't know if that is the right terminology)
I don't like the fact that the pop-up windows lock you in their scope.
Example: Start a standard manual backup....