Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi Stephen,
It was just a thought. I've had this functionality in the past on a profiler I used and it turned out to be very useful (though their results display could have used more attention). They actually tracked a profiling sessions automatically which was nice, but once you had a good history of them, they made VS bog down unless you reduced the number of old sessions. They also only let you compare 2 sessions. I thought comparing more at 1 time would have been useful in some circumstances.
Their integration with VS was nice to a certain extent, but they lagged pretty badly when new versions of VS would arrive. It would take nearly a year later for updates to support the new environment. I like your external to VS approach better. Also doesn't get the overhead of VS involved. Besides with the new VS2010 coming out this fall and its new add-in model, I suspect this may be a big pain point for them and their integration to VS. You guys, on the other hand, I would think would have very few issues unless the PDB format has drastically changed. Have you guys been following the VS2010 development?
Feel free to drop me a line on this if you guys decide to add the comparison stuff and want my input.
Yes, I am pretty careful to make sure the conditions are as close to the same as possible when creating profiling sessions.
I recently added a 2nd monitor to my setup. Thank you for doing all the right things when saving window positions and such to support this properly (many apps don't). Sometimes it's the little things that make all the difference.
Keep up the great work. Looking forward to AP5.
Tom / comments
Hi Stephen,
It was just a thought. I've had this functionality in the past on a profiler I used and it turned out to be very useful (though their results display could have used more attention). Th...
Hi Stephen,
I think the method grid would probably be the best place to start since it's the "simplest". Probably should be the main/only view for comparison, especially if the you allow comparisons of more than 2 sessions.
If the hit counts change, that could be very useful to compare. The big hurdle would be changes to the stack trace.
If the stack trace changed I might have a screen that is broken into thirds horizontally, showing methods in both sessions, added methods, removed methods. The columns would be made up of the hit count and method timing (one pair of columns for each session).
I suppose there could be a listbox on the left edge where I could drag & drop the sessions I want to compare into. Highlighting them would show the comparison. They should be automatically ordered by session date/time.
Export to Excel could also be handy in this view.
Hope this helps. / comments
Hi Stephen,
I think the method grid would probably be the best place to start since it's the "simplest". Probably should be the main/only view for comparison, especially if the you allow comparison...
This is running a webjob locally and not attaching to a process running in the cloud. dotTrace runs it fine, though their GUI is tough to interpret the results. / comments
This is running a webjob locally and not attaching to a process running in the cloud. dotTrace runs it fine, though their GUI is tough to interpret the results.
Not sure it's around any more. I just let the built-in error reporting send it. Not sure where it went. Trying to repro this and so far this morning the crash isn't happening. What I've found so far with ANTSPP v10.1.1067: With async awareness enabled: - Sample method level timings (inc framework): works - Method-level timings (only methods with source): fails - Line-level and method level: fails - Method levels (inc framework): fails - Line & Method level: fails With async awareness disabled: - Sample method level timings (inc framework): works - Method-level timings (only methods with source): works - Line-level and method level: fails - Method levels (inc framework): works - Line & Method level: fails As for other profiler options everything checked except the 1st option (Record File i/O performance) / comments
Not sure it's around any more. I just let the built-in error reporting send it. Not sure where it went. Trying to repro this and so far this morning the crash isn't happening.What I've found so far...
The screen and text are so tiny to be pretty much unreadable. 250% is the 'recommended' scaling factor according to windows. In the 100% scaling case the checkboxes are even smaller. / comments
The screen and text are so tiny to be pretty much unreadable. 250% is the 'recommended' scaling factor according to windows. In the 100% scaling case the checkboxes are even smaller.
Yes, the checkboxes are much better now in hi-dpi as is the gear icon.
I'm sure you are still aware of the high dpi issues that remain:
- pointer mouse cursor get super small when hovering over the checkboxes and in the compare results rea
- min/max/close icons in title bar, but the click area is bigger so this covers for the icons a bit
- the 'equals symbol' in the header in the identical list is very small
- Checkbox fields are clipped on the deployment screen (Backup target before, recompare after...)
- About box clipping
- Though there's no clipping, I'm guessing the splash screen also has some scaling issues.
Everything else looks good so far.
Thanks for your hard work on fixing these issues. / comments
Yes, the checkboxes are much better now in hi-dpi as is the gear icon.
I'm sure you are still aware of the high dpi issues that remain:
- pointer mouse cursor get super small when hovering over the...
v12.1.0.3760 Professional
Win10,
resolution: 3840x2160,
text scaling 250%,
Intel HD Graphics 520 chipset
Hope this helps. / comments
v12.1.0.3760 Professional
Win10,
resolution: 3840x2160,
text scaling 250%,
Intel HD Graphics 520 chipset
Hope this helps.
Upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1. I also don't have a stack trace for you. I'm running Vista Ultimate (32-bit). Crashed on startup while the splash screen was up.
I uninstalled Data Compare 6, an old Data Compare 5 that was left after the upgraded to 6.0 and then downloaded the new package from the downloads area. After installing that, it works again. Seems a bit slower on compare, but I'll have to play more with it to be sure. / comments
Upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1. I also don't have a stack trace for you. I'm running Vista Ultimate (32-bit). Crashed on startup while the splash screen was up.
I uninstalled Data Compare 6, an old Data ...
I found what I was doing wrong. I was working in the "SQL Compare" tool, but was looking at the help for the "SQL Data Compare" tool.
Tom / comments
I found what I was doing wrong. I was working in the "SQL Compare" tool, but was looking at the help for the "SQL Data Compare" tool.
Tom
Thanks. That's all I can ask.
Thanks for all your efforts. / comments
Thanks. That's all I can ask.
Thanks for all your efforts.