User profile for tschlarm

Not sure it's around any more. I just let the built-in error reporting send it. Not sure where it went. Trying to repro this and so far this morning the crash isn't happening. What I've found so far with ANTSPP v10.1.1067: With async awareness enabled: - Sample method level timings (inc framework): works - Method-level timings (only methods with source): fails - Line-level and method level: fails - Method levels (inc framework): fails - Line & Method level: fails With async awareness disabled: - Sample method level timings (inc framework): works - Method-level timings (only methods with source): works - Line-level and method level: fails - Method levels (inc framework): works - Line & Method level: fails As for other profiler options everything checked except the 1st option (Record File i/O performance) / comments

Not sure it's around any more. I just let the built-in error reporting send it. Not sure where it went. Trying to repro this and so far this morning the crash isn't happening.What I've found so far...

0 votes

The screen and text are so tiny to be pretty much unreadable. 250% is the 'recommended' scaling factor according to windows. In the 100% scaling case the checkboxes are even smaller. / comments

The screen and text are so tiny to be pretty much unreadable. 250% is the 'recommended' scaling factor according to windows. In the 100% scaling case the checkboxes are even smaller.

0 votes

Yes, the checkboxes are much better now in hi-dpi as is the gear icon. I'm sure you are still aware of the high dpi issues that remain: - pointer mouse cursor get super small when hovering over the checkboxes and in the compare results rea - min/max/close icons in title bar, but the click area is bigger so this covers for the icons a bit - the 'equals symbol' in the header in the identical list is very small - Checkbox fields are clipped on the deployment screen (Backup target before, recompare after...) - About box clipping - Though there's no clipping, I'm guessing the splash screen also has some scaling issues. Everything else looks good so far. Thanks for your hard work on fixing these issues. / comments

Yes, the checkboxes are much better now in hi-dpi as is the gear icon. I'm sure you are still aware of the high dpi issues that remain: - pointer mouse cursor get super small when hovering over the...

0 votes

v12.1.0.3760 Professional Win10, resolution: 3840x2160, text scaling 250%, Intel HD Graphics 520 chipset Hope this helps. / comments

v12.1.0.3760 Professional Win10, resolution: 3840x2160, text scaling 250%, Intel HD Graphics 520 chipset Hope this helps.

0 votes

Upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1. I also don't have a stack trace for you. I'm running Vista Ultimate (32-bit). Crashed on startup while the splash screen was up. I uninstalled Data Compare 6, an old Data Compare 5 that was left after the upgraded to 6.0 and then downloaded the new package from the downloads area. After installing that, it works again. Seems a bit slower on compare, but I'll have to play more with it to be sure. / comments

Upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1. I also don't have a stack trace for you. I'm running Vista Ultimate (32-bit). Crashed on startup while the splash screen was up. I uninstalled Data Compare 6, an old Data ...

0 votes

I found what I was doing wrong. I was working in the "SQL Compare" tool, but was looking at the help for the "SQL Data Compare" tool. Tom / comments

I found what I was doing wrong. I was working in the "SQL Compare" tool, but was looking at the help for the "SQL Data Compare" tool. Tom

0 votes

Thanks. That's all I can ask. Thanks for all your efforts. / comments

Thanks. That's all I can ask. Thanks for all your efforts.

0 votes

True, which is what I am doing. I am only saying this is not really optimal and an argument input box would be a welcome enhancement to the dialog should someone at RG care to enter it into the bugbase. / comments

True, which is what I am doing. I am only saying this is not really optimal and an argument input box would be a welcome enhancement to the dialog should someone at RG care to enter it into the bug...

0 votes

This error is still present in 10.2.0.315. / comments

This error is still present in 10.2.0.315.

0 votes

StephenC wrote: There's no way at the moment but I'll put this in as a feature request for the next version. How are you finding V6 so far if you don't mind me asking? By version to you mean a patch or v7? So far it's working quite well. I've only just started working with it (for the past few days). Here's what I like and wish for so far. APP6 in conjunction with the VS2010 IntelliTrace (IT), I'm working thru some previously unknown issues. Unknown because the app works fine and is reasonably fast (no client complaints anyway). However, preparing for the next version I wanted to use the new VS 2010 and APP6 on it to see what the new tools could tell me. The good ========= The SQL view is a welcome addition. I like the fact you can see the parameterized SQL arguments and hit count on each. MS's profiler doesn't show them. The File I/O view is cool, but I haven't had a chance to use it much yet as my app is a web app. It should be useful for a client app I have. It does tell me how often my site graphics are being downloaded, however. I love the progress bars behind APP's values. Makes it vary fast to spot something out of the ordinary. Improvements (in my opinion) ==================== I really wish APP6 had the comparison of performance reports. VS2010 does a pretty good job comparing, but the results can be a tough read sometimes. I put in a request for this back in the APP5 time-frame and was told it was being considered for APP6. Kind of disappointed it's not there as it's how we tell whether what we are doing is working. Also good to show management and clients why we need to factor in some time for profiling in the development cycle. I like the exception marks over the chart. VS2010/IT notes exceptions as well, except that IT allows you to break on exceptions which is really handy as the charting control I'm playing with seems to throw a lot of exceptions internally (slowing down my code). The chart control is also catching them internally so I never see them. VS2010's profiler and APP6 have the same issue in that it was hard to tell what what the call stack of the exception was so I could see in my code what the call was. In APP6, it would be nice to be able to double-click on the exception mark (or it's tooltip) and highlight it in the method list or at least the call in my code that invokes the call that caused the exception. Setting up IT to break on exceptions isolated this pretty quick. I love to see the APP6 exceptions functionality expanded in some way. APP6 does seem to have a delay after a profiling session while collecting its results for display. Occasionally it fools me into thinking it didn't collect anything in my code. If I wait a bit, the results pop in, but it could use a better 'loading' progress indicator. I guess the little hourglass in the treeview is a little too subtle for me. I didn't see it at first. The green progress circlet shows up when changing ranges and such, just not right after you finish profiling. APP6 could use a progress/wait message during sorting in the Methods grid. It kind of freezes when you have a very long list of functions and you decide to sort by namespace or Method Name. The Find box mitigates this somewhat by filtering the list. Sorting the filtered list performs much better. Personally, I'd love to see some integration between Reflector and APP. Handy for locating where exceptions were thrown. With the exception of comparison reports, all my APP6 issues are minor. I like APP6 and find it very useful. Using APP6 with IT and VS2010's profiler I made some pretty significant improvements. / comments

StephenC wrote: There's no way at the moment but I'll put this in as a feature request for the next version. How are you finding V6 so far if you don't mind me asking? By version to you mean a...

0 votes

How can we help you today?

tschlarm

Comments