Activity overview
Latest activity by scottnelson
WHERE clause editor not working
I'm trying to use the WHERE clause editor to filter rows included in data comparisons, and I've found that SDC is ignoring it. I'm using SDC v10.7.0.23.
For example, for the table scripted below, ...
bug in v8.0.1.9?
I've noticed that if I compare, say, two tables, but then only want to actually synch only one of them, SDC tries to synch both of them anyway--even if I uncheck one of the boxes.
I too am experiencing the big red x myself with v8.0.1.9 on Vista x64 / comments
I too am experiencing the big red x myself with v8.0.1.9 on Vista x64
Views missing from Schema Compare v8.1.0.360
I'm trying to clone a database on a SQL 2000 database onto SQL 2005 instance.
All is well, except that Red Gate SQL Compare does not see any of the views on the SQL 2000 box. It tells me that all ...
bug in 8.0.0.556
SQL Data Compare 8.0.0.556 seems to ignore the "Use transactions in SQL scripts" checkbox.
It always uses transactions whether you want it to or not...
It did fix the bug I posted about earlier, th...
OK, thanks. It is high on my fix list, though, because it is one of the most annoying "features" of the product, and I run into it quite frequently. [image] / comments
OK, thanks. It is high on my fix list, though, because it is one of the most annoying "features" of the product, and I run into it quite frequently.
Minor bug in generated script comments
I've noticed that the server names that get inserted into the comments at the top of generated scripts are backwards.
E.g., it always says "Run this script on ServerB.my_db - This database will be ...
Bug from v7.x still exists in 8.0 beta
Changing the custom comparison key still results in the "Columns in Comparison" defaulting back to every column.
I was told this was a bug due to be fixed in the next version....
yes. there are a few tables in my database that have an extremely high number of rows in them, and those are the ones that get archived based on date and hence would apply in this situation.
In other cases, I want all the inserts/updates/deletes to affect my target database. / comments
yes. there are a few tables in my database that have an extremely high number of rows in them, and those are the ones that get archived based on date and hence would apply in this situation.
In ot...
for the sake of what I need, I would have to be able to set this at the table level. / comments
for the sake of what I need, I would have to be able to set this at the table level.