Comments
Sort by recent activity
I tried upgrading (The PC was upgraded from Vista to Win7).
I then uninstalled all of the Red Gate programs, and kicked off a new install.
Toolbelt was run as a user in the Administrator group, by right clicking, and choosing run as Administrator. / comments
I tried upgrading (The PC was upgraded from Vista to Win7).
I then uninstalled all of the Red Gate programs, and kicked off a new install.
Toolbelt was run as a user in the Administrator group, by ...
I tried upgrading (The PC was upgraded from Vista to Win7).
I then uninstalled all of the Red Gate programs, and kicked off a new install.
Toolbelt was run as a user in the Administrator group, by right clicking, and choosing run as Administrator. / comments
I tried upgrading (The PC was upgraded from Vista to Win7).
I then uninstalled all of the Red Gate programs, and kicked off a new install.
Toolbelt was run as a user in the Administrator group, by ...
Agreed. Replication in some scenarios (e.g. web replication over firewalls) can be really hard to get working.
Although you can then script out a working replication set up, and edit the scripts to get it running on another set of servers, having the settings documented would be brilliant - and useful as well simply to avoid the need to script out replication objects to see how they are set up, or dive through layers of properties dialogs. / comments
Agreed. Replication in some scenarios (e.g. web replication over firewalls) can be really hard to get working.
Although you can then script out a working replication set up, and edit the scripts t...
Fair enough for the WMI access.
However, ideally, I'd like two default accounts - one for WMI, and one for SQL - it allows finer grained control over the rights assigned to each account. I guess it is too late given this is an RC. / comments
Fair enough for the WMI access.
However, ideally, I'd like two default accounts - one for WMI, and one for SQL - it allows finer grained control over the rights assigned to each account. I guess i...
Can you establish a VPN to the servers and connect over the VPN (thus getting access to 1433 as well as 135, without exposing it to the internet)? / comments
Can you establish a VPN to the servers and connect over the VPN (thus getting access to 1433 as well as 135, without exposing it to the internet)?
I noticed the same sort of problem:
in master db, when I type
select * from mydb.
SQL Prompt shows it's balloon tip with the message
retrieving data for database mydb
If I then choose myDB from the QA DB Combo box, and type
select * from
SQL Prompt shows it's balloon tip with the message
retrieving data for database myDB
It's already got that metadata, of course! / comments
I noticed the same sort of problem:
in master db, when I type
select * from mydb.
SQL Prompt shows it's balloon tip with the message
retrieving data for database mydb
If I then choose myDB fr...
My issue is that my client (who would be purchasing the tool) would not look at it as $57 per developer for three developers and $57 per DBA for two DBAs, they'd unfortunately look at it as $95 per developer for 40 developers (37 who only use Oracle), and $95 per DBA for 6 DBAs (4 who only look at Oracle).
They manage to get the concept of an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, but not appropriate price breaks for dev tools - for some bizarre reason they insist on costing dev tools on a per person basis. / comments
My issue is that my client (who would be purchasing the tool) would not look at it as $57 per developer for three developers and $57 per DBA for two DBAs, they'd unfortunately look at it as $95 per...
Following on from the scroll to candidate list rather than filter suggestion elsewhere, a more context sensitive candidate list would be good.
For example, if I include functions & system functions in the options, they naturally sort to the top of the list - but most of the time I'm actually interested in columns - particularly columns on tables already referred to in my query.
As a result, columns for tables already included in a query should filter to the top of the list - making the list a more useful reminder when you don't know the name of the column you're interested in - so you want to select from a list.
So, if I have all (or most) options selected in the Items to show in candidate list, and my query so far is select * from aardvarks a join zebras z on a.id = z.id where@CONNECTIONS.
If I actually do want to use a system function, then typing @ will bring it into focus. / comments
Following on from the scroll to candidate list rather than filter suggestion elsewhere, a more context sensitive candidate list would be good.
For example, if I include functions & system functions...
I'd second this - even though I didn't use the original tool.
The loss of the ability to open a pre-defined V3/V4 project for SQL Compare and Data Compare means I'm still using V4 instead of V5 - I haven't been bothered to run both side by side and re-setup my comparison projects in V5. / comments
I'd second this - even though I didn't use the original tool.
The loss of the ability to open a pre-defined V3/V4 project for SQL Compare and Data Compare means I'm still using V4 instead of V5 - I...