Comments
Sort by recent activity
I've done this, but reflector doesn't see the assembly I'm looking for.
My asp.net web app is dying looking for CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine version 10.5.3700
I can see it in the GAC, but reflector doesn't? It is MSIL.
can someone explain what's going on? / comments
I've done this, but reflector doesn't see the assembly I'm looking for.
My asp.net web app is dying looking for CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine version 10.5.3700
I can see it in the GAC, but...
Yes, same result.
Someone else here also went to the same link and got the same results. However, he then took off the file name to browse the location and was then able to see the file and download it normally.
we've got the file, but you may want to test your link from other locations. I've never seen this behavior before for a ZIP file. / comments
Yes, same result.
Someone else here also went to the same link and got the same results. However, he then took off the file name to browse the location and was then able to see the file and downlo...
Originally I was comparing the DB to a previously cloned version. However, even comparing the DB to itself gives the error. / comments
Originally I was comparing the DB to a previously cloned version. However, even comparing the DB to itself gives the error.
Dan,
Of course you need a time limit, but setting it the same as that of a full release version is pretty restrictive, especially when it expires even before the release date! This is the first instance I've ever seen that situation.
Your first Beta had no time limit, right? At least I didn't notice, because I ran it, liked the concept, spent a few days playing and commenting on the forum, and then got board and forgot about it till Beta 2.
If you're concerned about the Beta 2 harming sales, make it a time limit that extends beyond the projected release date by 30 or 45 days...
It's not going to kill your sales, as those that are using it often are GOING TO BUY THE REALEASE!! Those that don't weren't going to buy it anyway so an extra month of use is irrelevant to red-gate.
But then again, why would someone bother beta testing a product they have no interest in using? And, why would you ever want to treat beta testers just like some user trying a demo? They are spending their time HELPING you with a product that, by definition, isn't ready for prime time. If you think you can release a working product that fully solves the majority of users' needs and has no bugs, based solely on developers' opinions, I've got some land to sell you in Florida!
Has red-gate learned nothing from MS's new approach using CTPs and "interactive" product development? / comments
Dan,
Of course you need a time limit, but setting it the same as that of a full release version is pretty restrictive, especially when it expires even before the release date! This is the first in...
I had just changed the Application Options to use a different SQL editor. I used double quotes for the path, since it was in progra~1...
removing the dbl quotes prevents the exception. / comments
I had just changed the Application Options to use a different SQL editor. I used double quotes for the path, since it was in progra~1...
removing the dbl quotes prevents the exception.
Diddo, diddo, diddo.
another button to "copy all" is just too obvious. / comments
Diddo, diddo, diddo.
another button to "copy all" is just too obvious.
To Dan's comments back on the 5th....
To the issue of your use case. It's use case scenarios that are very helpful for a successful beta experience. If you were to have released a readme with the beta explaining this, and possibly other use cases invisioned by red-gate, you would have really imporved the initial experience and feed back from your testers! Got any more visions to share with us?
One annoyance I've found is the apparent lack of ability to REMOVE something you've added. Yes there's a "remove from project", but if you add an object X that itself uses 100 objects, there seems to be no easy way of undoing that action. you can remove object X, but the 100 other objects are now mixed in and not easy to "undo" / comments
To Dan's comments back on the 5th....
To the issue of your use case. It's use case scenarios that are very helpful for a successful beta experience. If you were to have released a readme with the...
Might even be nice if that cached list of servers were SHARED between all the red-gate products! / comments
Might even be nice if that cached list of servers were SHARED between all the red-gate products!
I suggest you guys smile and pat yourselves on the back for implementting a great idea and creating a BETA release of a very promising product!
Absolutely fantastic job, guys. I think I'll be using this one a LOT.
Of course, many of the suggestions here are great and some are even required for a fully released product, but you hit it on the head.
Performance is great for what it's doing, the CONCEPT of the layout is perfect. For Diagramming (and documenting) specific processes in a system, I believe the most important suggestion is being able to refine (or scope) the diagram to a spcific object and a desired level of dependencies.
Thanks, and keep up the good work! / comments
I suggest you guys smile and pat yourselves on the back for implementting a great idea and creating a BETA release of a very promising product!
Absolutely fantastic job, guys. I think I'll be using...
Sorry, I know this should have been in the SQLCompare forum...
Can you move it? :oops: / comments
Sorry, I know this should have been in the SQLCompare forum...
Can you move it? :oops: