Activity overview
Latest activity by vcbnvbm
nexus99 wrote:
What you say it is stupid because wikipedia already pays salary to its employees. But it doesnt force its users to pay. Because there will always be donations.
Requesting salary is not in open source way. They must stop forcing to pay for their work, and so must you. Because there will always be donations. / comments
nexus99 wrote:
What you say it is stupid because wikipedia already pays salary to its employees. But it doesnt force its users to pay. Because there will always be donations.
Requesting salary ...
Alex.Davies wrote:
One of the benefits of charging for reflector is that we will be able to afford to spend time on it. The "Open in .net reflector" feature isn't very good because we had to avoid parsing c# (and vb f# etc..) because that would take too long to implement. So we had to rely on piggy-backing on the existing "go to definition" feature.
So I can't promise anything, but if there's enough money to do the development work, it's something that I would like to improve.
You overcomplicate it too much. I have experience in this area and I can assure you, this task can be solved in much simpler way [image] / comments
Alex.Davies wrote:
One of the benefits of charging for reflector is that we will be able to afford to spend time on it. The "Open in .net reflector" feature isn't very good because we had to avo...
nexus99 wrote:
So, IF you DO your job properly, people WILL always appreciate it and donate money, even if you dont want.
If you really believe in this, you must stop asking for salary and start working for free. People will appreciate your work and give you lots of money, even if you refuse to take. / comments
nexus99 wrote:
So, IF you DO your job properly, people WILL always appreciate it and donate money, even if you dont want.
If you really believe in this, you must stop asking for salary and star...
RichardD wrote:
I do not agree that they have the right to expire v6 and force everyone to pay for the upgrade.
Not wise solution, I agree. They should move to v7 as soon as possible and stop any support of v6. That would work better.
Or abandon Reflector and create a new project Mirror, commercial from the beginning ^_^ / comments
RichardD wrote:
I do not agree that they have the right to expire v6 and force everyone to pay for the upgrade.
Not wise solution, I agree. They should move to v7 as soon as possible and stop a...
They have right to get money for their work.
Stop whining. / comments
They have right to get money for their work.
Stop whining.
"Open in .NET Reflector" feature is just useless
It can't find property/methods definition. It conflicts with Resharper and other software (the ridiculous "you do not need to use .NET Reflector" message). It doesn't work here, there.. it just doe...
write barrier performance impact
It seems, ANTS profiler is not aware of write barrier performance impact? At least, in my sample it didn't show the real place which executed very slowly (because of write barrier)
Clive Tong wrote:
It isn't trivial as there are places in the implementation where assemblies are looked up by name.
Well, just use the full name. It can't be so difficult. / comments
Clive Tong wrote:
It isn't trivial as there are places in the implementation where assemblies are looked up by name.
Well, just use the full name. It can't be so difficult.
side-by-side assembly load
Why doesn't Reflector allow to have in the main list several assemblies with the same name (but different versions) at the same time?
System.dll of versions 2.0 and 4.0, for instance.