Comments
4 comments
-
Hi,
That's very strange! What architecture / OS is the high performance server, out of interest?
The only other thing I can think of is that if you're running the comparison on the same box as the database is coming from, you're causing a whole load more disk seeks as SQL Server reads data then Data Compare writes it. However, I'd be amazed if it made as much of a difference as you're seeing.
Lastly, are you comparing between two live databases, or is one a backup?
Thanks,
Robert -
It is strange. The OS is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition SP2. I am synchronizing two live databases in both cases. I built the project on my dev. machine and copied the project file over to the database server. I opened the file from Sql Data Compare on the database server and ran it.
Are there any diagnostics I can run to get a clue? -
The one other difference I remember is that I had installed all the Red-Gate products on my dev. machine. On the database server (the problem machne), I chose to only install Sql Data Compare.
-
I picked another more powerful server to run the data comapre and it completed the task pretty fast. So, it seems this is a machine specific issue, which I will look at it on my own.
Thanks for the reply,
Regards,
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
What gives?
How can I go about figuring out what is making the synchronization so much slower?
Regards