Correspondence profiling exe and sources

• 
  Hi Oleg,
  
  Thanks for the comments. It's something we're certainly planning to look at in the future, though not in the V3 timescale.
  
  I like the idea of checking timestamps, but it would definitely have to be a "warning" rather than a fatal error - just because I've changed one line of my source file doesn't mean that ANTS should refuse to display it :-).
  
  Thanks,
  Rob

  Robert C March 01, 2007 04:34

  - 0 +
• 
  Hi Robert,
  yes, you are right, probably its possible in future to do some "smart" checking. I am sure you can find much methods.
  
  On one side ANTS should not to refuse to display, but on other side this "visual mistake" may be critical for person who is analyzing code ... ;-)
  
  Regards,
  Oleg.

  Oleg March 01, 2007 05:27

  - 0 +
• 
  I think what visual studio does when you try to run debug with modified code is refuse to let you. I don't think this is ideal either although it proves that there is some ability there to notice modified files.
  
  I think some warning option would be by far the best compromise as Robert suggested.

  richardjm March 05, 2007 03:47

  - 0 +
• 

  richardjm wrote:

  I think what visual studio does when you try to run debug with modified code is refuse to let you. I don't think this is ideal either although it proves that there is some ability there to notice modified files.
  
  I think some warning option would be by far the best compromise as Robert suggested.

  
  yes, I agree.

  Oleg March 05, 2007 03:51

  - 0 +

Add comment

Please sign in to leave a comment.