Comments
8 comments
-
Hi,
You probably want to be looking at the "Options" tab on your project configuration as opposed to filters.
There's tickboxes in there to ignore differences in whitespace, and differences that only exist in the extended properties.
Hope that helps,
James -
aspillert wrote:Is it possible to exclude between sp_addextendedproperty differences between views in two databases? The Extended Property filter rule doesn't seem to do anything.
Also - can a COMPARE be done without considering the format or whitespace in the view code? I use SQL Prompt to format on our test and production systems, but the developers use "Design", so format is always different.
Thank you for any assistance
I have this same issue. I really don't want the REDGATE extended properties added via SQL Source Control to be in my migration scripts. SQL Compare, no matter what you have set in the OPTIONS for "IGNORE" Extended Properties, still adds it at the end of the script. This is really frustrating. -
mmoore wrote:aspillert wrote:Is it possible to exclude between sp_addextendedproperty differences between views in two databases? The Extended Property filter rule doesn't seem to do anything.
Also - can a COMPARE be done without considering the format or whitespace in the view code? I use SQL Prompt to format on our test and production systems, but the developers use "Design", so format is always different.
Thank you for any assistance
I have this same issue. I really don't want the REDGATE extended properties added via SQL Source Control to be in my migration scripts. SQL Compare, no matter what you have set in the OPTIONS for "IGNORE" Extended Properties, still adds it at the end of the script. This is really frustrating.
After looking further into this, I noticed that this only applies to the Extended Properties that are added by SQL Source Control. They are always added, which in my case is pointless on my customer's Sql Server. -
mmoore wrote:After looking further into this, I noticed that this only applies to the Extended Properties that are added by SQL Source Control. They are always added, which in my case is pointless on my customer's Sql Server.
I don't think that's the case. I check-boxed this option in the "Ignore" section and still had the SQL Source Control version number update appear in the deployment script.
I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to not have to manually edit my script every time I deploy to an environment that's not under SQL Source Control, especially since those environments aren't always updated to the LATEST in our repository (we selectively deploy objects to the target environment). -
Can you try selecting Edit Project/Options/Behavior/Ignore Migration Scripts for databases.
Does this help?
David Atkinson
Red Gate -
Is it possible to enable this option using the command line?David Atkinson wrote:Can you try selecting Edit Project/Options/Behavior/Ignore Migration Scripts for databases.
Does this help?
David Atkinson
Red Gate -
Hi,
The command line for this option is one of the following:/Options:DisableSOCForLiveDBs
Or using the alias/Options:dafld
Full list of the Command Line Options can be found HERE.
Many Thanks
Eddie -
eddie davis wrote:Hi,
The command line for this option is one of the following:/Options:DisableSOCForLiveDBs
Or using the alias/Options:dafld
Full list of the Command Line Options can be found HERE.
Many Thanks
Eddie
That option works great! Thanks!
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Also - can a COMPARE be done without considering the format or whitespace in the view code? I use SQL Prompt to format on our test and production systems, but the developers use "Design", so format is always different.
Thank you for any assistance