Activity overview
Latest activity by Deep
Is SQL Toolbelt (SQL source Control, SQL Compare, SQL search, SQL Prompt etc.) part of external or Flyaway products. Can you please provide details on product names that are vulnerable to log4j security bug. / comments
Is SQL Toolbelt (SQL source Control, SQL Compare, SQL search, SQL Prompt etc.) part of external or Flyaway products. Can you please provide details on product names that are vulnerable to log4j se...
Redgate SQL toolbelt
We are using Redgate SQL Toolbelt that contains SQL source control, Sql Prompt, SQL Compare, SQL Search etc.Do we need to download any hotfixes for Log4J issue?
For transferring SQL Source Control license to my colleague, if I remove myself from SQL Source Control license, will I be able to add another user? I don't want to cancel our license. / comments
For transferring SQL Source Control license to my colleague, if I remove myself from SQL Source Control license, will I be able to add another user? I don't want to cancel our license.
We purchased a bundle of the tool belt. SQL Source Control is part of that bundle. / comments
We purchased a bundle of the tool belt. SQL Source Control is part of that bundle.
Also if I remove myself from SQL Source Control license, will I be able to add another user? I dont want to cancel our license. / comments
Also if I remove myself from SQL Source Control license, will I be able to add another user? I dont want to cancel our license.
Hi Ben, When I log on to the portal, I see the "Trial" button on SQL Source Control. Why does it show "Trial" We have bought a license for this. / comments
Hi Ben, When I log on to the portal, I see the "Trial" button on SQL Source Control. Why does it show "Trial" We have bought a license for this.
transfer license to another user in the same team
I need to transfer my SQL source control license to another user on my team. How do I do that?
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as duplicate files in the logs) from the local repository and
then commit the change to GitHub to remove the files from GitHub, and then link
source code control.
I still
do not understand why removing a table and creating view with same name caused
Redgate SQL Source Control to go Topsy Turvy, while the operation was valid for
the database. Suggesting to start a new repository was a bad idea, as we would
lose all the change history. Please get to the root cause of the problem to
resolve this for future.
After
that resolution, hundreds of objects appeared as Change Type “Conflict”, I had to select each one to set “Keep Mine”. Why
can’t I bulk select and set “Keep Mine”? The product seems very unstable,
and needs some serious updates, especially the version to work with GitHub. / comments
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as ...
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as duplicate files in the logs) from the local repository and
then commit the change to GitHub to remove the files from GitHub, and then link
source code control.
I still
do not understand why removing a table and creating view with same name caused
Redgate SQL Source Control to go Topsy Turvy, while the operation was valid for
the database. Suggesting to start a new repository was a bad idea, as we would
lose all the change history. Please get to the root cause of the problem to
resolve this for future.
After
that resolution, hundreds of objects appeared as Change Type “Conflict”, I had to select each one to set “Keep Mine”. Why
can’t I bulk select and set “Keep Mine”? The product seems very unstable,
and needs some serious updates, especially the version to work with GitHub. / comments
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as ...
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as duplicate files in the logs) from the local repository and
then commit the change to GitHub to remove the files from GitHub, and then link
source code control.
I still
do not understand why removing a table and creating view with same name caused
Redgate SQL Source Control to go Topsy Turvy, while the operation was valid for
the database. Suggesting to start a new repository was a bad idea, as we would
lose all the change history. Please get to the root cause of the problem to
resolve this for future.
After
that resolution, hundreds of objects appeared as Change Type “Conflict”, I had to select each one to set “Keep Mine”. Why
can’t I bulk select and set “Keep Mine”? The product seems very unstable,
and needs some serious updates, especially the version to work with GitHub.
/ comments
Just
removing the files from transient folder as suggested by Redgate earlier was
not working.
The
following process worked: Unlink Source code control; Remove the files (that
were showing up as ...