Activity overview
Latest activity by fyamamoto
Upgrading from standard to pro
I purchased an upgrade from standard to proffesional. Afterwards I tried running the install which ran succesfully; however, it doesn't give me access to the memory profiler still. I de-isntalled...
I've not tried bringing up the profiler on a development web server yet. I only have one license, so I wasn't sure what was involved with moving the licensing around. On the server that I am testing on, I can profile console applications just fine though.
It seems that today I can connect to ports 8084 and 8086 via a telnet to those ports.
The application runs fine when I kick it off on the specified port of 8013. I'll try a demo download on a development web server. / comments
I've not tried bringing up the profiler on a development web server yet. I only have one license, so I wasn't sure what was involved with moving the licensing around. On the server that I am test...
One more bit of info...
I started the profiler and telneted to port 8086... Seems that a connection is established.
I noticed that the profiler logs that it used port 8084 at some point. When I tried telneting to that port I get an error saying I can't connect to that port. What's 8086 used for as opposed to 8084?
Thanks!
-Franklin / comments
One more bit of info...
I started the profiler and telneted to port 8086... Seems that a connection is established.
I noticed that the profiler logs that it used port 8084 at some point. When I tr...
I was trying to get this to work with a fairly simple solution. It's basically a webform with a code behind that does nothing. I checked to see if page caching was on but it doesn't appear to be. I pasted the code behind at the bottom of this.
Would I still get the waiting for connection at the bottom of the page if .net wasn't getting loaded? I did notice that I see a new w3wp process running as system getting kicked up upon starting profile of the web application.
I took a second look at the output from netstat and saw this... I would have thought this would be w3wp?
Thanks...
TCP 0.0.0.0:8013 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 4
[System]
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.SessionState;
using System.Web.UI;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
namespace WebApplication5
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for WebForm1.
/// </summary>
public class WebForm1 : System.Web.UI.Page
{
private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
// Put user code to initialize the page here
}
#region Web Form Designer generated code
override protected void OnInit(EventArgs e)
{
//
// CODEGEN: This call is required by the ASP.NET Web Form Designer.
//
InitializeComponent();
base.OnInit(e);
}
/// <summary>
/// Required method for Designer support - do not modify
/// the contents of this method with the code editor.
/// </summary>
private void InitializeComponent()
{
this.Load += new System.EventHandler(this.Page_Load);
}
#endregion
}
} / comments
I was trying to get this to work with a fairly simple solution. It's basically a webform with a code behind that does nothing. I checked to see if page caching was on but it doesn't appear to be....