Comments
Sort by recent activity
Oops! Sorry for the false alarm. It seems that object hints are indeed working. I was hovering over a TRUNCATE TABLE statement and wasn't getting any hints. I didn't realize I wasn't supposed to get any hints there. / comments
Oops! Sorry for the false alarm. It seems that object hints are indeed working. I was hovering over a TRUNCATE TABLE statement and wasn't getting any hints. I didn't realize I wasn't supposed to ge...
Nice workaround. I'm about to edit a 2000 line procedure, so I'll probably need to use it. Thanks! / comments
Nice workaround. I'm about to edit a 2000 line procedure, so I'll probably need to use it. Thanks!
Hmm, now object definition hints aren't working. With or without the "workaround" above. This is turning out to be a bad day for Prompt. Are they working for you? (It's the "hyperlink" when you hover over a name.) / comments
Hmm, now object definition hints aren't working. With or without the "workaround" above. This is turning out to be a bad day for Prompt. Are they working for you? (It's the "hyperlink" when you hov...
That appears to be an older version. Is that intentional? I'll install it anyway. Thanks!
Edit: I had to uninstall Prompt to install this version. However, it did not solve the problem. Double-click selections are still not working correctly. I'll attempt to roll back to an even earlier build.
Edit 2: Trying to rollback to an earlier build of 3.8 causes the add-in to stop working completely. Uninstalling/reinstalling/repairing doesn't help. The only solution is to go to build 402 or later. So now I'm locked into this terrible double-click selection behavior. Red Gate, can anyone speak up about this? / comments
That appears to be an older version. Is that intentional? I'll install it anyway. Thanks!
Edit: I had to uninstall Prompt to install this version. However, it did not solve the problem. Double-clic...
I also see this. This is a critical issue which will cause me to revert to v3.8. / comments
I also see this. This is a critical issue which will cause me to revert to v3.8.
The option you mentioned is indeed turned off. Would turning it on solve my problem? I'm curious why you would ever be able to drop an assembly without first dropping it's dependent objects. Thanks. / comments
The option you mentioned is indeed turned off. Would turning it on solve my problem? I'm curious why you would ever be able to drop an assembly without first dropping it's dependent objects. Thanks.
Since updating an assembly is rare, I haven't had the opportunity to try this out yet. When I do, I'll let you know if the option solved the problem. If it does, I'm confused why the default behavior is the way it is. I don't see how the default behavior would ever work. I must be missing something. Thanks! / comments
Since updating an assembly is rare, I haven't had the opportunity to try this out yet. When I do, I'll let you know if the option solved the problem. If it does, I'm confused why the default behavi...
I'd like to second the request for reloading scripts. I would highly prefer to be notified that the file has changed on disk and asked if I'd like to reload it (similar to almost any other program). This would only happen when I switch back to Multi Script, of course. Thanks! / comments
I'd like to second the request for reloading scripts. I would highly prefer to be notified that the file has changed on disk and asked if I'd like to reload it (similar to almost any other program)...
A feature similar to this would probably be considered my "#1" productivity booster. Basically, I'd love an option to "Override USE statements in script" so that if any USE statements happen to be in the script, they go away and the script actually runs on the database which Multi Script intends it to. This would literally shave minutes off of every single work day for me. Thanks a bunch! / comments
A feature similar to this would probably be considered my "#1" productivity booster. Basically, I'd love an option to "Override USE statements in script" so that if any USE statements happen to be ...
I recently used Dependency Tracker for the first time, and my primary issue with it was similar to this thread. Let me describe my situation and what I was looking for; perhaps this will help focus the discussion.
When I need to do a dependency analysis, it involves not just the database but also other source code in various projects. This requires me to do multiple analyses in various manners and merge them into a central dependency tree. I create this tree as an Excel spreadsheet, which I then pass to my team to work on.
Dependency Tracker would be the ideal tool to perform the database portion of this analysis. The issue I ran into, however, is that there is no easy way to get the list of dependent objects out into Excel. Once I've brought up a diagram in Tracker, I just need the Type and Name of every dependent object. Preferably, I'd like to be able to just copy this list into the clipboard, and have it tab-delimited so it will paste into Excel as two columns. If not that, then I at least need a plain-text export. Again: I just need the list of dependent objects, not what their relationship is, or any other metadata beyond the type of object.
Tracker is not very useful to me until this kind of thing can be done easily. As it was, I had to manually retype the name of every object into my spreadsheet. Not the ideal situation.
The final piece to this would be creating an easy way to select just the objects that are dependents, and not select the original objects that I placed in the diagram for analysis. I already know what those objects are -- I don't need them any more.
Hope it helps! Thanks for another great tool. / comments
I recently used Dependency Tracker for the first time, and my primary issue with it was similar to this thread. Let me describe my situation and what I was looking for; perhaps this will help focus...