Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi Ritchie,
We have had no other reports of this (and if it was broken I would expect a large number of reports very quickly). Can you let me have a few details about your setup so we can see if we can reproduce this here? (OS, User type, Bitness of OS, Are you using Mono, are there any command line arguments, do you have and add-in's installed?)
Thanks,
James / comments
Hi Ritchie,
We have had no other reports of this (and if it was broken I would expect a large number of reports very quickly). Can you let me have a few details about your setup so we can see if we...
Mike,
I will see if I can get a copy of that assembly and try and understand why its happening with just that method.
James / comments
Mike,
I will see if I can get a copy of that assembly and try and understand why its happening with just that method.
James
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the bug report. These are normally caused by an obfuscator creating IL which cannot be expressed in C#. We will have a look and verify that this is the case.
If it is unfortunately there is often very little we can do to create some sort of meaningful C# representation when the control flow has been altered so radically.
James / comments
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the bug report. These are normally caused by an obfuscator creating IL which cannot be expressed in C#. We will have a look and verify that this is the case.
If it is unfortunat...
Hi Johan,
Thanks for the request. I have added it to our list of things to look at over the next few months from a technical point of view to see how feesible it is.
James / comments
Hi Johan,
Thanks for the request. I have added it to our list of things to look at over the next few months from a technical point of view to see how feesible it is.
James
This is odd. There was no change to the startup code made between 5.1.2.0 (the last version released by Lutz) and 5.1.3/4.0.
Could you have a look at CPU usage and memory usage during startup and let us know what it does?
Thanks,
James / comments
This is odd. There was no change to the startup code made between 5.1.2.0 (the last version released by Lutz) and 5.1.3/4.0.
Could you have a look at CPU usage and memory usage during startup and l...
Hi there,
Unfortunately the diff tool is not on Codeplex so I can't make any changes but I had a dig around in the source (from (http://www.codingsanity.com/diff.htm) and I can't see any handlers in there for command line arguments.
If you want to add your own you can get the source code from codingsanity.com and then if you have a look in DiffPackage.cs you can add some code to the Load method using Environment.CommandLine to pick up the arguments you pass in and show the diff window and load the appropriate assemblies.
Hope this helps and sorry there isnt a really easy solution,
James / comments
Hi there,
Unfortunately the diff tool is not on Codeplex so I can't make any changes but I had a dig around in the source (from (http://www.codingsanity.com/diff.htm) and I can't see any handlers i...
Hi Paulo,
Sorry you have hit these problems.
To clarify did it work once you had provided the proxy server's defaults?
IIRC .NET 1.0 (which Reflector is written in) had a few problems with proxy server's and IE's settings. I have logged a bug in our tracking system for someone to take a good look at the code and to see if we can work around some of these problems in the future.
James / comments
Hi Paulo,
Sorry you have hit these problems.
To clarify did it work once you had provided the proxy server's defaults?
IIRC .NET 1.0 (which Reflector is written in) had a few problems with proxy se...
Hi Nick,
As you can see in the forum we get lots of requests for this and we will certainly be looking at ways we can make it easier to work with offline in the future.
Regards,
James / comments
Hi Nick,
As you can see in the forum we get lots of requests for this and we will certainly be looking at ways we can make it easier to work with offline in the future.
Regards,
James
Hi there,
Unfortunately there isn't anything you can do to stop it from happening right now. We will be getting our usability experts to look at Reflector over the next few months and we should be able to clean up plenty of issues like this.
In the mean time you can bring the search dialog backup quite quickly by pressing F3 - I know its not ideal.
Regards,
James / comments
Hi there,
Unfortunately there isn't anything you can do to stop it from happening right now. We will be getting our usability experts to look at Reflector over the next few months and we should be ...
Yep!
Sorry I was away for a the past few weeks so haven't been as on top of replying here as I would like to be [image]
As covered in a previous thread, there are no historic release notes but we will be putting some in-place for future releases of Reflector (5.1.4.0 which was released a few weeks ago had only two small bug fixes and we changed the expiry date of the build to next march).
As for obfuscation - Lutz made the decision to obfuscate Reflector several years ago. We have not changed this since taking over Reflector. I'm not overly sure we are ever likely to change this although if there is a good reason to then we will have a think about it.
Sorry for not answering this thread earlier,
James / comments
Yep!
Sorry I was away for a the past few weeks so haven't been as on top of replying here as I would like to be
As covered in a previous thread, there are no historic release notes but we will be ...