Comments
Sort by recent activity
Yes, the alias did the trick. Thanks a lot for your help! / comments
Yes, the alias did the trick. Thanks a lot for your help!
Sorry, the 100GB in my post was a typo. It should have been 100MB so I corrected it. My apologies for the confusion. / comments
Sorry, the 100GB in my post was a typo. It should have been 100MB so I corrected it. My apologies for the confusion.
Thanks. I'll submit feedback. / comments
Thanks. I'll submit feedback.
I guess it's time for new eyeglasses. I looked through the documentation and somehow missed that switch.
Thanks,
Dan / comments
I guess it's time for new eyeglasses. I looked through the documentation and somehow missed that switch.
Thanks,
Dan
Is there any more news on this? I too would like the include dependencies default to be configurable.
Thanks. / comments
Is there any more news on this? I too would like the include dependencies default to be configurable.
Thanks.
Thanks for the update, Robert. I just installed SQL Source Control 4.0 and didn't see such an option.
The reason I'd like the configurable default is that we have one database that has many partitioned views and member tables. For each view, the number of tables vary by installation target so we only keep a view containing a single table in source control along the member table. These are excluded from visibility using filters. However, developers sometimes forget to uncheck the dependency box when checking in objects that reference partitioned views, and that pulls in the multi-tabled partitioned view and member tables too. I have to routinely clean up the mess. / comments
Thanks for the update, Robert. I just installed SQL Source Control 4.0 and didn't see such an option.
The reason I'd like the configurable default is that we have one database that has many partit...