Comments
Sort by recent activity
Can I ask which OS you were installing the UAA Service on?
We've seen this on IIS 7. / comments
Can I ask which OS you were installing the UAA Service on?
We've seen this on IIS 7.
Thanks we'll raise a bug and look into it. / comments
Thanks we'll raise a bug and look into it.
That's the second time we've seen that issue of windows authentication not being turned on the parent website. Was this a website you created yourself or did you let the installer create it.
If the former we'll need documentation.
If the latter we'll need to ensure we set the appropriate authentication - if we can.
Thanks / comments
That's the second time we've seen that issue of windows authentication not being turned on the parent website. Was this a website you created yourself or did you let the installer create it.
If the...
Do you mean that the Admin Console asks for a login? Or that when you go to the UAA Service website you are asked for a login.
If the former. Is the UAA Service installed on a computer in the domain (it should be). If so ensure that Windows Authentication is turned on for the virtual directory.
If the latter - the admin@mydomain.com login should work.
Can you tell me a little about where the various services are installed? / comments
Do you mean that the Admin Console asks for a login? Or that when you go to the UAA Service website you are asked for a login.
If the former. Is the UAA Service installed on a computer in the domai...
We could do but we wanted to imitate the default setting of Exchange. That is that administrators don't have rights to view anybodies e-mail by default.
I could imagine that you may in a compliance situation need to delegate this authority to non-administrator type users. And really that's it's main purpose.
What do you think? / comments
We could do but we wanted to imitate the default setting of Exchange. That is that administrators don't have rights to view anybodies e-mail by default.
I could imagine that you may in a compliance...
At the moment we're looking at sometime in April or May. We're going to be putting a much updated version in the next couple of weeks dubbed a "Pre-release". This is going to include things like the Outlook 2003 Add-in and OWA 2003 Add-in. / comments
At the moment we're looking at sometime in April or May. We're going to be putting a much updated version in the next couple of weeks dubbed a "Pre-release". This is going to include things like th...
Which is now available.
Hope you get to try it out. / comments
Which is now available.
Hope you get to try it out.
Thanks for clarifying, we'll put that on our backlog.
It's really nice that people have been so patient with SQL Multi Script, the issue internally was that some development work was done on the mainline branch but never left in a state fit to be released (the projects work). We had to sort that mess out before we could start shipping it again. The last release I think fixed most of the remaining projects issues so now we can move forward with other enhancements. / comments
Thanks for clarifying, we'll put that on our backlog.
It's really nice that people have been so patient with SQL Multi Script, the issue internally was that some development work was done on the ma...
So would you want that per script and database (harder) or just a global increasing rowcount/time for all scripts on all databases? / comments
So would you want that per script and database (harder) or just a global increasing rowcount/time for all scripts on all databases?
Can I just second the thanks for that feedback.
The couple of things we're probably going to be doing next in multi-script is a "save all" and a pattern based "add databases". Some of the things you suggest can be rolled into that work. / comments
Can I just second the thanks for that feedback.
The couple of things we're probably going to be doing next in multi-script is a "save all" and a pattern based "add databases". Some of the things yo...