Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi Dan,
I've now found a situation similar to yours in our database and it seems possible that the issues you are experiencing are caused by the re-architecture in newer versions of SmartAssembly.
I'm guessing you upgraded to the newest release of version 6 of the tool (v. 6.7) ? I believe Smartassembly v6.2 may work better for you. If you wish, you can download it from here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/G ... d_versions / comments
Hi Dan,
I've now found a situation similar to yours in our database and it seems possible that the issues you are experiencing are caused by the re-architecture in newer versions of SmartAssembly.
...
Hi Dan!
Thanks for that information.
SmartAssembly supports applications based on .NET 4.0 so it should work alright--there isn't anything you'd have to do differently than with NET 3.5.
There is a similar error to yours posted about on a forum here: http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-I ... 00d476d19d
Although unsuccessful for him, it may be worth it to try the same steps he did (i.e. using the GUID numbers to check for and delete any duplicates) / comments
Hi Dan!
Thanks for that information.
SmartAssembly supports applications based on .NET 4.0 so it should work alright--there isn't anything you'd have to do differently than with NET 3.5.
There is a...
Hi Dan,
Could you please try unregistering, rebooting, and then re-registering? / comments
Hi Dan,
Could you please try unregistering, rebooting, and then re-registering?
That's no problem--I'm glad to hear that things are working better with method level timings! [image]
If you were previously using one of the line-level profiling modes, these are more intrusive on your code which explains why it may have been breaking your site. You can read more about the different profiling modes here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/c ... ilingModes / comments
That's no problem--I'm glad to hear that things are working better with method level timings!
If you were previously using one of the line-level profiling modes, these are more intrusive on your c...
Hi Phil,
If I am understanding correctly.. the profiler works alright and remains attached to your application, but stops showing results after a certain point?
In case the site is breaking somehow with the line level option, does profiling in a less detailed setting change anything? / comments
Hi Phil,
If I am understanding correctly.. the profiler works alright and remains attached to your application, but stops showing results after a certain point?
In case the site is breaking somehow...
Hi Cameron!
Max and Min times are not available in the current version of ANTS Performance Profiler, though a request has been added to put these features back in.
If need be, you can downgrade to ANTS Profiler v.3 (at http://www.red-gate.com/downgrade), which does provide these statistics. However, this version is missing a lot of the really useful stuff available in 7.0 and probably doesn't work on .NET 4. / comments
Hi Cameron!
Max and Min times are not available in the current version of ANTS Performance Profiler, though a request has been added to put these features back in.
If need be, you can downgrade to ...
Thanks for that feedback DanAvni! I've passed it on to our developers. / comments
Thanks for that feedback DanAvni! I've passed it on to our developers.
Hi DanAvni,
No changes to this yet, I'm so sorry to say, and our apologies for the lack of updates!
I've spoken with our dev team and it looks like a major reason this hasn't been implemented yet is because we've had to wait until the new SQL Prompt formatting engine was completed. This was an entirely new formatting engine which makes the formatting code more shareable- the SQL Prompt team have been working on it for the last few years and have just finished earlier this year.
With the new engine done though, there are still some technical issues and other decisions that need to be worked out before a formatting feature can be added. For example, there seems to be two distinct use-cases for Prompt formatting in Compare: either to use Prompt formatting as a way to ignore formatting differences at comparison time, or to use Compare to apply Prompt formatting at deployment time. For both cases, we'd need to work out a way for SQL Compare to format that would be least confusing (the former in particular would break the "what you see compared is what you get deployed" way that Compare currently does things which is a concern).
We are currently working on some things that would technically make this easier, so we may hopefully see more progress here in the future! / comments
Hi DanAvni,
No changes to this yet, I'm so sorry to say, and our apologies for the lack of updates!
I've spoken with our dev team and it looks like a major reason this hasn't been implemented yet i...
Hello!
Yes, the snapshot API feature has been available since version 7.0 of the Memory Profiler. It's simple to use--just add a reference to RedGate.MemoryProfiler.Snapshot.dll and call RedGate.MemoryProfiler.Snapshot.TakeSnapshot() in your code as needed.
You can find more about it here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/c ... apshot_api / comments
Hello!
Yes, the snapshot API feature has been available since version 7.0 of the Memory Profiler. It's simple to use--just add a reference to RedGate.MemoryProfiler.Snapshot.dll and call RedGate.Me...
Another customer was able to resolve this issue by adding
[assembly: System.Security.SecurityRules(System.Security.SecurityRuleSet.Level1)]
to the assembly.cs file of the offending assemblies. / comments
Another customer was able to resolve this issue by adding
[assembly: System.Security.SecurityRules(System.Security.SecurityRuleSet.Level1)]
to the assembly.cs file of the offending assemblies.