Comments
Sort by recent activity
No problem! Glad to hear it's sorted out [image] / comments
No problem! Glad to hear it's sorted out
Hello,
Thanks for the example code. I tried running the profiler on it but I'm afraid I wasn't able to reproduce the issue. I wonder.. perhaps you had different parts of the timeline selected each time it gave a different hit count? Can you please try selecting the entire timeline and see if that gives 10000? The timeline can also get a bit out of sync (generally only by a few seconds) so it can help to select a slightly larger region if that's in use. / comments
Hello,
Thanks for the example code. I tried running the profiler on it but I'm afraid I wasn't able to reproduce the issue. I wonder.. perhaps you had different parts of the timeline selected each ...
Great--please let us know if you have any other questions! [image] / comments
Great--please let us know if you have any other questions!
Hi there,
You may be interested in using the SDK to create a custom error reporting template and add those options: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/c ... 6.7/SA_SDK / comments
Hi there,
You may be interested in using the SDK to create a custom error reporting template and add those options: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/c ... 6.7/SA_SDK
Hi Richard,
Is it possible for you to upgrade to the latest version of the profiler (7.4)? / comments
Hi Richard,
Is it possible for you to upgrade to the latest version of the profiler (7.4)?
Sorry about that! You're right, my distributed test app does seem to work (though it should still expire after 2 weeks). I'm trying to sort out now when it will give an expiration warning vs. when it simply won't run.
For now, does that same C# app that's working on other machines run successfully on the machine giving this ArgumentNullException error? / comments
Sorry about that! You're right, my distributed test app does seem to work (though it should still expire after 2 weeks). I'm trying to sort out now when it will give an expiration warning vs. when ...
Hello!
Thanks for your post. Can I check--are you running the program on a different machine from where it was built (by SmartAssembly)? Assemblies built by a trial version of SmartAssembly can't be distributed, I'm afraid, though it should work fine on the original machine! [image] / comments
Hello!
Thanks for your post. Can I check--are you running the program on a different machine from where it was built (by SmartAssembly)? Assemblies built by a trial version of SmartAssembly can't b...
Hi Javier!
So, it turns out that the actual problem here is that I was having a moment of stupidity..:oops:
In version 6.7, the attribute is now KeepPublicMembersAccessible rather than ExcludePublicMembers
My deepest apologies for the confusion! / comments
Hi Javier!
So, it turns out that the actual problem here is that I was having a moment of stupidity..:oops:
In version 6.7, the attribute is now KeepPublicMembersAccessible rather than ExcludePubli...
Hi Javier,
I've come across a comment that the developers have made in regards to exclusions. Apparently, exclusions can vary depending on a whole host of factors such as the type of assemblies being processed, which combination of other features may be enabled, the CLR version being targetted and more. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause! / comments
Hi Javier,
I've come across a comment that the developers have made in regards to exclusions. Apparently, exclusions can vary depending on a whole host of factors such as the type of assemblies bei...
Oh, I see--SmartAssembly does support WPF, but it will automatically skip obfuscation of some objects in a WPF assembly, I'm afraid. [image] It does this to make sure that the obfuscated version of your application will still work with your xaml file. Are all the objects getting skipped related to WPF? / comments
Oh, I see--SmartAssembly does support WPF, but it will automatically skip obfuscation of some objects in a WPF assembly, I'm afraid. It does this to make sure that the obfuscated version of your ...