Comments
Sort by recent activity
Yes, that is strange. SmartAssembly does purposely skip obfuscation of certain types though -- are those objects that aren't getting obfuscated any of the following?
· Any type with the Serializable attribute specified will not be obfuscated
· Any type with a base class of System.MulticastDelegate will not be obfuscated
· Any type with the System.ServiceModel.OperationContractAttribute specified will not be obfuscated
· Any type with the System.ServiceModel.ServiceContractAttribute specified will not be obfuscated
· Any method with the System.Reflection.DefaultMemberAttribute specified will not be obfuscated
· Any type with an attribute starting with System.Xml.Serialization. set will not be obfuscated / comments
Yes, that is strange. SmartAssembly does purposely skip obfuscation of certain types though -- are those objects that aren't getting obfuscated any of the following?
· Any type with the Serializabl...
It looks like something changed in the latest version of SmartAssembly that makes that workaround
<Obfuscation ExcludePublicMembers="0" Obfuscate="1">
invalid, I'm afraid. I've opened a bug for this with reference SA-1389 .
In the meantime, you could downgrade to version 6.6 which I've found still works: http://downloads.red-gate.com/checkforu ... 6.4.95.exe
Sorry for this inconvenience! / comments
It looks like something changed in the latest version of SmartAssembly that makes that workaround
<Obfuscation ExcludePublicMembers="0" Obfuscate="1">
invalid, I'm afraid. I've opened a bug for thi...
Just a note in case another user runs into this: the mode.com error should normally be harmless, but we have just seen one case where it was the main cause of a build failure. The user had to make sure that "C:\Windows\System32;C:\Windows\SysWOW64" were both in the Jenkins node PATH variable in the node configuration section to get things working. / comments
Just a note in case another user runs into this: the mode.com error should normally be harmless, but we have just seen one case where it was the main cause of a build failure. The user had to make ...
Hi Busi,
Thank you for your post! Can I ask--are you placing custom event markers within your events? If so, the custom events might happen so soon after the actual events that only the actual events' markers appear in the timeline (though both markers might still show for the first occurrence). The profiler removes events that are too close together in order to avoid ending up with huge results files.
Shorter methods like this might cause this:
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
button1.Text = "Clicked";
RedGate.Profiler.UserEvents.ProfilerEvent.SignalEvent("button");
} / comments
Hi Busi,
Thank you for your post! Can I ask--are you placing custom event markers within your events? If so, the custom events might happen so soon after the actual events that only the actual even...
Thank you for your post. Can I first check--have you tried running the profiler as administrator? / comments
Thank you for your post. Can I first check--have you tried running the profiler as administrator?
Hello Pete,
There isn't a way to do this at the moment, I'm sorry to say. However, we have this feature request logged in our internal tracking system with reference MP-1765. I will let you know of any updates. / comments
Hello Pete,
There isn't a way to do this at the moment, I'm sorry to say. However, we have this feature request logged in our internal tracking system with reference MP-1765. I will let you know of...
Hello,
Yes, the proxy that you set up within SmartAssembly specifies how SmartAssembly itself will connect to the web service, but not exactly how your error reports will send out (though users can specify this through the Secured Proxy SDK exception reporting form). / comments
Hello,
Yes, the proxy that you set up within SmartAssembly specifies how SmartAssembly itself will connect to the web service, but not exactly how your error reports will send out (though users can...
Thanks for your message. Can I first double check--is the "I want to use a web proxy server" box ticked in the SmartAssembly UI (under Tools>Options)? / comments
Thanks for your message. Can I first double check--is the "I want to use a web proxy server" box ticked in the SmartAssembly UI (under Tools>Options)?
UPDATE:
Just to clarify--when using a SQL database to store reports, you'll need to enter in your computerName\SQLserverInstance into Options>ReportsDatabaseOptions in SmartAssembly. This string is the same as what you enter to connect to your SQL server in SSMS. You won't need to worry about creating your own database or tables in the SQL server. SmartAssembly will automatically do this! [image] / comments
UPDATE:
Just to clarify--when using a SQL database to store reports, you'll need to enter in your computerName\SQLserverInstance into Options>ReportsDatabaseOptions in SmartAssembly. This string is...
Ah, I see. You will only need to specify your computer name and SQL server instance name in Options, rather than including the actual database name. SmartAssembly will then automatically create the SmartAssembly database in the specified SQL server instance. The string you enter in options should look like computername\SQLserverInstanceName, for example: "(local)\SQLExpress". / comments
Ah, I see. You will only need to specify your computer name and SQL server instance name in Options, rather than including the actual database name. SmartAssembly will then automatically create the...