How can we help you today? How can we help you today?
meastland
Peter - Are there any plans to include an option in a future release to force the removal of a source file even if the destination file already exists in a MOVETO configuration? / comments
Peter - Are there any plans to include an option in a future release to force the removal of a source file even if the destination file already exists in a MOVETO configuration?
0 votes
Chris - Any update on this? Can we expect the functionality to be included in 7.3? I am still running on version 6.5 and will likely wait for this to be addressed before upgraded to 7.x. Thanks in advance. / comments
Chris - Any update on this? Can we expect the functionality to be included in 7.3? I am still running on version 6.5 and will likely wait for this to be addressed before upgraded to 7.x. Thanks ...
0 votes
Peter, Thanks for the quick response. Is it possible to be notified when the fix is available? Thanks, -Mike / comments
Peter, Thanks for the quick response. Is it possible to be notified when the fix is available? Thanks, -Mike
0 votes
Peter, I have seen the issue occur on log backup files anywhere from 2GB to 6GB. In terms of logged errors, I am seeing the following: From the initial backup log file: 7/2/2011 8:43:06 AM: Warning 130: MOVETO error: Failed to move file: <source_directory_and_file_path> (The system cannot find the file specified.) This path references a UNC share, but it is local to the server from which the backup is being executed. 7/2/2011 8:43:14 AM: Moved <source_file> to <destination_directory>. The file is getting to the destination directory at some point, as indicated by subsequest error messages. From the next log restore attempt: 7/2/2011 10:10:19 AM: Warning 170: Log files are not in sequence: 7/2/2011 10:10:20 AM: SQL Server error 7/2/2011 10:10:20 AM: SQL error 3013: SQL error 3013: RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally. 7/2/2011 10:10:20 AM: SQL error 4326: SQL error 4326: The log in this backup set terminates at LSN 959142000003918900001, which is too early to apply to the database. A more recent log backup that includes LSN 959142000004032400001 can be restored. 7/2/2011 10:10:20 AM: Warning 130: MOVETO error: Failed to move file: <source_directory_and_file_path> (The file exists.) From subsequent log restore attempts until problem file is manually removed from source directory: 7/2/2011 12:10:22 PM: Warning 170: Log files are not in sequence: 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL Server error 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL error 3013: SQL error 3013: RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally. 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL error 4326: SQL error 4326: The log in this backup set terminates at LSN 959142000003918900001, which is too early to apply to the database. A more recent log backup that includes LSN 959142000004032400001 can be restored. 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: Warning 470: Transaction log has already been restored. 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: Warning 130: MOVETO error: Failed to move file: <source_directory_and_file_path> (The file exists.) 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: Restoring Newsletter (transaction logs) from: 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL Server error 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL error 3013: SQL error 3013: RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally. 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: SQL error 4305: SQL error 4305: The log in this backup set begins at LSN 959143000007452500001, which is too recent to apply to the database. An earlier log backup that includes LSN 959142000004032400001 can be restored. 7/2/2011 12:10:23 PM: Mail sent successfully to: <notification_email_address> It appears that each of the error and/or warning codes you referenced are represented in the error log chain. I guess my next question is, do I need to look to further customize the log shipping implementation to handle this condition? Thanks again for your time. -Mike / comments
Peter, I have seen the issue occur on log backup files anywhere from 2GB to 6GB. In terms of logged errors, I am seeing the following:From the initial backup log file: 7/2/2011 8:43:06 AM: Warning...
0 votes
Linda, Will there be a patch back-ported for 6.x? My company did not purchase the support agreement, so I think we'd have to pay for 7.0. Thanks, -Mike / comments
Linda, Will there be a patch back-ported for 6.x? My company did not purchase the support agreement, so I think we'd have to pay for 7.0. Thanks, -Mike
0 votes