Comments
Sort by recent activity
Thanks I checked out the whole project, ran sqlcompare and then checked it all back in. I don't have time to check the differences, so this solution works great for me at the moment. Thanks! / comments
Thanks I checked out the whole project, ran sqlcompare and then checked it all back in. I don't have time to check the differences, so this solution works great for me at the moment. Thanks!
cgautreaux wrote:
I am migrating from 2000 to 2005 using the ole detach attach method. There are 47 databases. Is there an easy way to use your tools to sync the sql jobs?
:?:
You could script them out easily if you don't have many. If you have lots then use some kind of automation with SMO. / comments
cgautreaux wrote:
I am migrating from 2000 to 2005 using the ole detach attach method. There are 47 databases. Is there an easy way to use your tools to sync the sql jobs?
:?:
You could scrip...
Thanks David - that does help a lot. However, I'd still prefer to be able to see a column for the schema as you do in SQL Compare (although you still call it owner).
I'd like to submit that as a feature request (and call the column schema, not owner).
keymoo / comments
Thanks David - that does help a lot. However, I'd still prefer to be able to see a column for the schema as you do in SQL Compare (although you still call it owner).
I'd like to submit that as a fe...
Chris Spencer wrote:
Hi
I can see the problem you are having and have subsequently raised an enhancement request internally.
However, I'm unable to give any timescale at the moment as to when it may get done.
Regards
Chris
Hi Chris,
Any idea when this feature will be released? I have many schemas in my database and some of them have tables with the same name. This feature should be treated as urgent.
Thanks!
keymoo / comments
Chris Spencer wrote:
Hi
I can see the problem you are having and have subsequently raised an enhancement request internally.
However, I'm unable to give any timescale at the moment as to when it...
Thanks for the reply. I generated a synch script (took about a day to generate), with the resulting file 157 GB. This file failed to run using sqlcmd at the commandline.
Have a bulk option would be very useful indeed when comparing databases with large data differences. / comments
Thanks for the reply. I generated a synch script (took about a day to generate), with the resulting file 157 GB. This file failed to run using sqlcmd at the commandline.
Have a bulk option would be...