Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi,
Actually it turned out to be a bit simpler than that. I had these problems:
First I had to disable MS AntiSpyware (will you be fixing this in the future).
Then I discovered that I couldn't use the syntax http://localhost/default.aspx (ie it has to be a folder). Come on, this shouldn't cause an exception!
Finally I discovered that there was a profiler process hanging around (probably a dead one from all the exceptions) once I killed that it seemed to run OK.
On the whole it seems to do the job - bit it's a bit 'fragile' to say the least...
S. / comments
Hi,
Actually it turned out to be a bit simpler than that. I had these problems:
First I had to disable MS AntiSpyware (will you be fixing this in the future).
Then I discovered that I couldn't use ...
H,
I think is was Redgate.Profiler.UI.exe or something...
S. / comments
H,
I think is was Redgate.Profiler.UI.exe or something...
S.
It seems that the VS 2010 profiler won't work either.
This page suggests that there is a location element missing (I'm getting an identical error): http://netindonesia.net/blogs/jimmy/arc ... t-not.aspx
Could that be tripping up ANTS too?
S.
Brian Donahue wrote:
Yes, but need to reproduce in-house. This softeware is totally unfriendly to production debugging. Obviously ANTS Profiler is causing your program to crash, that's problem number one. Then there is a deadlock bug on summaraizing - that's problem number two.
So I need to have this happen on my computer. What special thing is ProfilerCore.dll doing that hoses your application in the first place? Is there anything in the event log?
/ comments
It seems that the VS 2010 profiler won't work either.
This page suggests that there is a location element missing (I'm getting an identical error):http://netindonesia.net/blogs/jimmy/arc ... t-not....
Hi Brian,
Scratch that. VS 2010 started working I just ran it again...doh!
S.
Brian Donahue wrote:
Yes, but need to reproduce in-house. This softeware is totally unfriendly to production debugging. Obviously ANTS Profiler is causing your program to crash, that's problem number one. Then there is a deadlock bug on summaraizing - that's problem number two.
So I need to have this happen on my computer. What special thing is ProfilerCore.dll doing that hoses your application in the first place? Is there anything in the event log?
/ comments
Hi Brian,
Scratch that. VS 2010 started working I just ran it again...doh!
S.
Brian Donahue wrote:
Yes, but need to reproduce in-house. This softeware is totally unfriendly to production debugging...
Hi Brian,
Completely understand, obviously I can reproduce it here - happy to have a remote desktop session if that helps. It happens 100%.
Cheers
Steve
Brian Donahue wrote:
Looks like we're in another one of those "unless you can reproduce it we won't try to fix it" arguments.
At one point, I could get this to happen sometimes by killing the process being profiled in Task Manager. But I can't get it to happen reliably enough. Any pointers as to how I can hang Profiler on summarizing results are most welcome.
/ comments
Hi Brian,
Completely understand, obviously I can reproduce it here - happy to have a remote desktop session if that helps. It happens 100%.
Cheers
Steve
Brian Donahue wrote:
Looks like we're in an...
These are the steps:
1. Start a profile session.
2. The browser loads but displays a 404 message.
3. ANTS spins 'Summarizing results'.
4. If I refresh the browser page then the API call works and a new W3P process is NOT created.
There are no messages in the event log other than 'Message logging has been turned on'.
The W3P process that reported the message is still active and hasn't crashed. If my code had really died I would have expected that process to die as well??
If I attach to the process directly then all is well. I can also profile an ASP.Net 3.5 (2.0) application just fine on the same machine.
The only unusual factor that I can think of is that this is a WCF 4.0 application. There's nothing complicated about the application itself.
I wonder if the profile is starting too quickly? After IIS is listening but before WCF has started.
Is there any additional logging I can enable?
Best regards
Steve
Brian Donahue wrote:
Yes, but need to reproduce in-house. This softeware is totally unfriendly to production debugging. Obviously ANTS Profiler is causinf you rprogram to crash, that's problem number one. Then it was a deadlock bug on summaraizing - that's problem number two.
So I need to have this happen on my computer. What special thing is ProfilerCore.dll doing that hoses your application in the first place? Is there anything in the event log?
/ comments
These are the steps:
1. Start a profile session.
2. The browser loads but displays a 404 message.
3. ANTS spins 'Summarizing results'.
4. If I refresh the browser page then the API call works and a...
Hi Brian,
I'm getting the same symptoms as this with a WCF 4 application in IIS.
I can attach to the process OK and run a profile, but it's not a line level analysis.
Do you have an update?
Many thanks
Steve
Brian Donahue wrote:
Thanks for posting in the Performance Profiler forum. I think there are two issues at work. One is that IE doesn't give us a predictable process ID for the instance of iexplore.exe running the Silverlight. The only way to make it work reliably is to kill all instances of IE from Task Manager (some may not even be "visible").
The second problem is a bug that when there are no results or an error occurs sending results, the green thing spins around forever ( PP-1144 ). We're working to get this fixed.
/ comments
Hi Brian,
I'm getting the same symptoms as this with a WCF 4 application in IIS.
I can attach to the process OK and run a profile, but it's not a line level analysis.
Do you have an update?
Many th...
Daniel Handley wrote:
Hi Steve
The most likely cause of the addition of a deselected object is that you have "include dependencies" selected.
This means that any deselected objects that have dependencies to a selected object will still be included.
Regards
Dan
Possibly, it was certainly ticked, I will have to look that up.
It would be nice if the 'included' dependancy was highlighted a little better - the change would have broken our system if I hadn't removed it.
Many thanks
Steve / comments
Daniel Handley wrote:
Hi Steve
The most likely cause of the addition of a deselected object is that you have "include dependencies" selected.
This means that any deselected objects that have dep...