Comments
Sort by recent activity
Carly,
Feel free to post here news and highlights about Down Tools Week. I'm too lazy to chase Twitter. / comments
Carly,
Feel free to post here news and highlights about Down Tools Week. I'm too lazy to chase Twitter.
TheSQLGuru wrote: »
Ordering is probably not as useful as search honestly. But if you have hundreds or thousands of objects search would be REALLY helpful. And if you are going to allow search it should be 2-phase: i.e. you can restrict the search to object names or drop it down into the code of the differences. This is quite different from a browser search and I think adds to the usefulness.
Most of the times, ordering is used as part of a search procedure. If there's no search, people will order and scroll to find what they want. / comments
TheSQLGuru wrote: »
Ordering is probably not as useful as search honestly. But if you have hundreds or thousands of objects search would be REALLY helpful. And if you are going to allow search ...
AnnabelB wrote: »
Hey Paulo, Yes of course.
You just need to go into 'Profile', 'Edit Profile', then select 'Notification Preferences', in General, select 'Email' for "Notify me when people comment on discussions I've participated in", and then below in 'Category Notifications' select 'Email' for 'Discussions' and 'Comments'. Hopefully that's straight forward. I see you've already edited your signature - which looks good [image]
Unfortunately, the notifications don't include the message. [image] / comments
AnnabelB wrote: »
Hey Paulo, Yes of course.
You just need to go into 'Profile', 'Edit Profile', then select 'Notification Preferences', in General, select 'Email' for "Notify me when people com...
Is it possible to get e-mail notifications for new and updated posts? / comments
Is it possible to get e-mail notifications for new and updated posts?
The funny thing is that it detects the existence of a new version but cannot download it (unless I specify the proxy settings).
I've changed the required runtime to v2.0.50727. Let's ee how it works now. / comments
The funny thing is that it detects the existence of a new version but cannot download it (unless I specify the proxy settings).
I've changed the required runtime to v2.0.50727. Let's ee how it work...
I have a feeling that this should be optional.
Probably another option on View / Options / Disassembler. View Source would override all options. / comments
I have a feeling that this should be optional.
Probably another option on View / Options / Disassembler. View Source would override all options.
I wounder how I missed that in SQL Data Compare 5. :oops: / comments
I wounder how I missed that in SQL Data Compare 5. :oops:
And I have suggested it before. [image]
I have thought of the trigger. In the present example it would be easy to have a trigger to set the the DateTime value to getutcdate(). But, what if I have another DateTime column "EfectiveFrom" that is a static value just form that synchronization operation? / comments
And I have suggested it before.
I have thought of the trigger. In the present example it would be easy to have a trigger to set the the DateTime value to getutcdate(). But, what if I have another...
I'm also facing a problem where I need to generate rows referencing a subset of the referenced tables.
Isn't this a common use scenario? / comments
I'm also facing a problem where I need to generate rows referencing a subset of the referenced tables.
Isn't this a common use scenario?
I'd like to have the possibility to generate drop/create scripts for objects like procedures, functions, triggers, views and anything else that can be dropped without losing data. / comments
I'd like to have the possibility to generate drop/create scripts for objects like procedures, functions, triggers, views and anything else that can be dropped without losing data.