Comments
Sort by recent activity
Well, that confirms to me that this release is an easy "Skip - irrelevant". Cheers! / comments
Well, that confirms to me that this release is an easy "Skip - irrelevant".Cheers!
I don't have any wierdness that I'm aware of... I have a laptop but the term "roaming profiles" is not one I have encountered in setup in any way vis a vis Windows. It's a plain boring XP Pro box with all the latest SPs and patch-Tuesday fixes applied. I'm a local admin, if that makes any difference.
On the Export Results, I hadn't clicked on anything other than to expand the three "different" panes - no objects clicked-on.
We have a bog standard setup as far as system views etc are concerned. Lacking a true DBA we didn't know you could even "customize" these objects... Databases at present are all SS2000 but that should change in under a fortnight to 2008 across the board. It appears the dt_ SPs are artifacts from Visual Studio Source Control integration and so far they appear in every DB... Pity the filters aren't yet definable "globally" as these would be in there for every DB on every instance! / comments
I don't have any wierdness that I'm aware of... I have a laptop but the term "roaming profiles" is not one I have encountered in setup in any way vis a vis Windows. It's a plain boring XP Pro box...
"Strong feature" - couldn't agree more... / comments
"Strong feature" - couldn't agree more...
One more vote for "please restore the double-click reverses direction functionality". I use it more often than not because
1. It keeps the number of projects I have down to a minimum.
2. It also lets me decide which direction I really want to go when I find I need to push to the next environment or pull, as in the case of an e-fix.
Having to right-click, re-do the compare and, most importantly, lose all the check marks I just painstakingly went through making is a severely retrograde step. / comments
One more vote for "please restore the double-click reverses direction functionality". I use it more often than not because
1. It keeps the number of projects I have down to a minimum.
2. It also...
Thanks for the warm reception re the filtered count, Alex.
Yes, something along the lines of the dual-number display would be great. I'd vote for filter-count first, as in 5 of 135, bolded for not-read as currently exhibited.
Cheers! / comments
Thanks for the warm reception re the filtered count, Alex.
Yes, something along the lines of the dual-number display would be great. I'd vote for filter-count first, as in 5 of 135, bolded for not...
Thanks, Alex, but IMO that's a very bad decision for Red Gate to have made.
Consider that, as you saw from the attached image, I have 7 groups under my server tree. I click on the root, giving me the entire list. I set the filter THERE.
Red Gate says I must click down every node to see if any of my 21 servers has an alert of that kind, AFTER I have clicked on one of my group nodes to see "how do I fare in this group of servers?"
It makes no sense to show overall numbers when I have explicitly filtered to see the wood for the trees. My count-granularity should always reflect filtering at all levels. It's uninformative to see "you have 350 unread Alerts" all the time, when the issue I am looking at applies to a handful of servers and a couple of handfuls of unread alerts of my filter type...
At worst, please give us a configuration that says "always show total unread" or "Show filter-level unread" so the tree makes sense and I can navigate via the tree rather than by the jumble of alerts in the all-servers detail list...
Thanks for your consideration. / comments
Thanks, Alex, but IMO that's a very bad decision for Red Gate to have made.
Consider that, as you saw from the attached image, I have 7 groups under my server tree. I click on the root, giving me ...
Older_1.png shows GROUPED alerts - 3 in the first, 1 in the second.
When I select the LAST ONE, Older_2.png shows "Newer" is greyed-out.
According to your post, it ought not be...
Older_3.png is the first in a list of 24 total alerts in 23 groups. It is a singleton. It is incapable of being navigated away from using the "Older" link - greyed-out. The next in the list is also a singleton. There is but ONE Alert that is a set of two grouped items.
IMO, page size when viewing a detail record is utterly irrelevant, particularly when that record is a singleton...
Please fix this for everyone else - I have turned off the unwanted, unwarned, undesirable, group "feature", so I don't need a fix. / comments
Older_1.png shows GROUPED alerts - 3 in the first, 1 in the second.
When I select the LAST ONE, Older_2.png shows "Newer" is greyed-out.
According to your post, it ought not be...
Older_3.png is th...
Yes, Alex, you assessment is correct, and that would be my expected behaviour too.
Thanks for picking this one up. / comments
Yes, Alex, you assessment is correct, and that would be my expected behaviour too.
Thanks for picking this one up.
And here is why, it seems...
Whose idea was it to TURN ON GROUPS? That breaks "Older"!
It is, and forever will stay that way, OFF!
Good grief, chaps / comments
And here is why, it seems...
Whose idea was it to TURN ON GROUPS? That breaks "Older"!
It is, and forever will stay that way, OFF!
Good grief, chaps
Which begs the question, "When will the Product correctly support gMSA logins, for initial install and updates?"
Although you present a workaround, you final sentence negates it on the grounds of practicality. I have over 20 separate boxes to attend to and faffing with the registry et al isn't my favorite activity, especially when you tell me I'll have the problem again on updates...
Please accelerate full support of gMSA logins in at least THIS product. We attempted to use a gMSA with SQL Monitor and gave up that futile exercise too... / comments
Which begs the question, "When will the Product correctly support gMSA logins, for initial install and updates?"
Although you present a workaround, you final sentence negates it on the grounds of p...