Comments
Sort by recent activity
Thanks- the heads-up is very much appreciated. I am asking our guys what is happening here... / comments
Thanks- the heads-up is very much appreciated. I am asking our guys what is happening here...
Sorry you're having this problem. Please see http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... 20Profiler
for the PDF version and http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... 20Profiler
for the more succinct version. This should help clarify how to profile on original IIS port. if the docs are not helpful , please tell is exactly why. / comments
Sorry you're having this problem. Please seehttp://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... 20Profiler
for the PDF version andhttp://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... 20Profiler
for the more succinc...
The most recent version of SA catches WPF exceptions and tries whenever possible to let the app *continue* which is what 99% of developers would generally wish to happen. / comments
The most recent version of SA catches WPF exceptions and tries whenever possible to let the app *continue* which is what 99% of developers would generally wish to happen.
It sounds to me that if you have other processes needing an http url, you need to configure your silverlight application as a web application first.
Doesn't your link help, when followed through: http://forums.silverlight.net/forums/p/ ... spx#187521
? / comments
It sounds to me that if you have other processes needing an http url, you need to configure your silverlight application as a web application first.
Doesn't your link help, when followed through:ht...
OK, thank you. Please do not merge or embed the satellite assemblies as it's known that this breaks their loading. Sorry. / comments
OK, thank you. Please do not merge or embed the satellite assemblies as it's known that this breaks their loading. Sorry.
This really does look like an OS issue.
Forgive me but I do not understand the significance of case-sensitivity of sattelite resources. Perhaps the obvious question is- how does your system work, without smartassembly? (How do you get the file system to respect case-sensitivity such that no over-writing occurs). Could it be that seperate smartassembly projects are needed?
You can embed protected assemblies as well as merge- this may be how you can best workaround this.
>>Also; is there some form of bug tracker, or similar where I should be reporting bugs?
Not publically available, sorry, no. This forum works and, if necessary, we open a formal support ticket if you write to: support@red-gate.com / comments
This really does look like an OS issue.
Forgive me but I do not understand the significance of case-sensitivity of sattelite resources. Perhaps the obvious question is- how does your system work, w...
No. Sorry.
The profiler doesn't have a snapshot model. It has a "time-line" model where you profile all of your application and if you need to filter out specific times, you can click and drag on the time line.
So, two things that might help you are "user events"- this is a way of 'synchronizing' your code to the time line. Please check the out here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... wledgebase\ANTS_Performance_Profiler\KB200811000319.htm&p=ANTS%20Performance%20Profiler
(its not restricted to ASP.NET).
Secondly, as far as automation of a profiling session goes, we have the command-line version called profiler.exe. Deatils here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... e_Profiler\help\6.2\app_commandline.htm&p=ANTS%20Performance%20Profiler / comments
No. Sorry.
The profiler doesn't have a snapshot model. It has a "time-line" model where you profile all of your application and if you need to filter out specific times, you can click and drag on t...
It looks very much like this assembly has been obfuscated. You'd need to set your expectations pretty low when it comes to decompiling this and I'd say you should expect to have to manually rename. Alternatively you could write a parser that automatically renames for you. There's bound to be plenty of third party libraries so help you do this. Please check whether it has been obfuscated, perhaps you've found a bug in reflector but I doubt it... / comments
It looks very much like this assembly has been obfuscated. You'd need to set your expectations pretty low when it comes to decompiling this and I'd say you should expect to have to manually rename....
It looks very much like this assembly has been obfuscated. You'd need to set your expectations pretty low when it comes to decompiling this and I'd say you should expect to have to manually rename. Alternatively you could write a parser that automatically renames for you. There's bound to be plenty of third party libraries so help you do this. Please check whether it has been obfuscated, perhaps you've found a bug in reflector but I doubt it... / comments
It looks very much like this assembly has been obfuscated. You'd need to set your expectations pretty low when it comes to decompiling this and I'd say you should expect to have to manually rename....
You can only do accurate *absolute* timings when the profiler is in low-overhead mode. This discounts using line-level profiling. Can you repeat the experiment with sampling mode? Also, wall-clock times are going to be heavily influenced by external latencies. Try CPU timing first - again if its comparing *absolute* time you are interested in. / comments
You can only do accurate *absolute* timings when the profiler is in low-overhead mode. This discounts using line-level profiling. Can you repeat the experiment with sampling mode? Also, wall-clock ...