Comments
Sort by recent activity
Sorry- I'm not entirely clear why you are dropping at point 6? It looks like you might have missed off point 5? / comments
Sorry- I'm not entirely clear why you are dropping at point 6? It looks like you might have missed off point 5?
This is feature request: SC-4188 I can't be specific when it will hit the streets just yet but it will happen. / comments
This is feature request: SC-4188 I can't be specific when it will hit the streets just yet but it will happen.
Right- I will see if this is a feature I can add to the list- I agree with you that this is desirable behaviour. / comments
Right- I will see if this is a feature I can add to the list- I agree with you that this is desirable behaviour.
Sorry not sure what you mean- can you give an example of the type of custom program you'd like to launch? / comments
Sorry not sure what you mean- can you give an example of the type of custom program you'd like to launch?
I chatted with the product experts and they clued me in- the differences that are there and shouldn't be reported are there because what you see is a simple text difference- i.e. this is by design. We do intend to put a little more intelligence in the algorithm but we are trying to gauge if the trade off (in terms of time) is acceptable.
The differences that are not there that are reported are because, when flagging a block of differences, Compare doesn't always notice that there is an identical line- but in a different place. Perfect comparisons are a hard problem (winmerge, 'beyond compare' etc all suffer the same problem ). I believe Compare tries to re-order statements to minimise flagged differences but it cannot do this for all lines.
In summary- this behaviour is all by design but we recognise it could be better and the products continue to evolve. / comments
I chatted with the product experts and they clued me in- the differences that are there and shouldn't be reported are there because what you see is a simple text difference- i.e. this is by design....
Thank you - good points, of course. I'll check to see if this is a known issue and try to get an idea of when it might be addressed. / comments
Thank you - good points, of course. I'll check to see if this is a known issue and try to get an idea of when it might be addressed.
Is that the actual binding in IISadmin of your website? If not please use the same url as is configured in IISadmin.
If it is, can you check with task manager to see that your process is indeed launched? / comments
Is that the actual binding in IISadmin of your website? If not please use the same url as is configured in IISadmin.
If it is, can you check with task manager to see that your process is indeed lau...
The very latest EA version (3.0.0.50) has this feature- I just tested to confirm.
[/img] / comments
The very latest EA version (3.0.0.50) has this feature- I just tested to confirm.
[/img]
We'd really need to reproduce this in house to know exactly what is happening - would you help us do that? / comments
We'd really need to reproduce this in house to know exactly what is happening - would you help us do that?
Hi- I think your original question is good and interesting (and it sparked off a lot of internal discussion). I'm by no means an expert on garbage collection but I do know ANTS performance profiler.
Have you tried including all the memory counters including the Gen 0/Gen 1 promoted (bytes/sec) counters - these are most useful as they give rates of activity rather than absolute values? You should then be able to correlate GC activity with your code (although, as Brian points out- it is an indirect correlation). / comments
Hi- I think your original question is good and interesting (and it sparked off a lot of internal discussion). I'm by no means an expert on garbage collection but I do know ANTS performance profiler...