Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi David,
just to clarify the first set of actions so we are definitely on the same page:
- take a snapshot
- group by namespace in the Class list
- expand a namespace until you find the class you are interested in
- create a Class Reference Graph for it
- go to the Instance list from one of the links in a node (or just jump to the instance list)
- Switch back to the Class List and the 'Group by Namespace' has been cleared
If i've followed it correctly i don't get the clearing of the checkbox. It takes me back to exactly the same place before I first left the Class List. The checkbox is still checked and the class for which i created the reference graph for is still selected.
Stephen / comments
Hi David,
just to clarify the first set of actions so we are definitely on the same page:
- take a snapshot
- group by namespace in the Class list
- expand a namespace until you find the class you ...
We have this in our system and we will be releasing a V5.2 at some point in the near future where this will most likely be fixed.
Sorry for the inconvenience at the moment and I'll update the post when the build/fix is released.
Stephen / comments
We have this in our system and we will be releasing a V5.2 at some point in the near future where this will most likely be fixed.
Sorry for the inconvenience at the moment and I'll update the post ...
Stack trace data isn't available in V5 of the memory profiler simply because of the massive overhead this causes to record and we wanted to concentrate on making an extremely low overhead profiler for V5 which is in some ways more geared towards memory leak finding although not necessarily.
There is a section at the bottom of the Summary tab indicating when heap fragmentation is a likely cause of problems being observed.
Using the Class Reference graph is also often helpful in combination with filters to identify objects which are referncing other classes for you to determine objects that should be reduced.
We are considering recording stack trace information for V6 although for a large % of people the overhead and impact on the application being profiled will be too high to make it a useful feature.
Stephen / comments
Stack trace data isn't available in V5 of the memory profiler simply because of the massive overhead this causes to record and we wanted to concentrate on making an extremely low overhead profiler ...
Hi Mark,
that has actually been implemented for V6 of the Profiler.
We will be starting an early access program (maybe as soon as Friday but don't count on that) for V6 which will include the command line feature.
Stephen / comments
Hi Mark,
that has actually been implemented for V6 of the Profiler.
We will be starting an early access program (maybe as soon as Friday but don't count on that) for V6 which will include the comma...
Hi Frank,
I've sent you an email with some information about this problem if you could let me know if it works.
I'll post further on here if this problem is diagnosed.
Stephen / comments
Hi Frank,
I've sent you an email with some information about this problem if you could let me know if it works.
I'll post further on here if this problem is diagnosed.
Stephen
The solution to this was that the application is using a GC server mode with the following in the .config file:
<gcServer enabled="true"/>
Commenting this out so it would use the default setting made the filters work in this case.
It's similar to the issue posted in another topic: http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... php?t=9585
Stephen / comments
The solution to this was that the application is using a GC server mode with the following in the .config file:
<gcServer enabled="true"/>
Commenting this out so it would use the default setting ma...
Hi Frank,
what type of application are you profiling?
Stephen / comments
Hi Frank,
what type of application are you profiling?
Stephen
Hi,
I can't seem to access the image. Could you check the URL.
Thanks,
Stephen / comments
Hi,
I can't seem to access the image. Could you check the URL.
Thanks,
Stephen
That's great!
Thanks for letting me know.
Stephen / comments
That's great!
Thanks for letting me know.
Stephen
Just to be totally clear -
you have already been evaluating the profiler at the office where it's working fine? (Just when you said that you really wanted to evaluate it sounded for a second like you hadn't managed to try it at all. I'm assuming you just meant you want to evaluate it more).
It's unlikely the processor type will have any effect.
It really does sound like the TLS slots have been filled on your computer which is the problem. Other programs will be responsible for this really - can be caused by things like anti-virus programs, other Office programs, other-addins etc... Even deleting other applications will not ensure that it will then work because there's no way to tell what the slots currently consist of which makes getting around it impossible to try and find an easy solution. This doesn't appear to happen with 2003 because of the fewer use of slots which leaves one available for the profiler.
Stephen / comments
Just to be totally clear -
you have already been evaluating the profiler at the office where it's working fine? (Just when you said that you really wanted to evaluate it sounded for a second like y...