Comments
Sort by recent activity
Oh, I think you mean when you choose "Open in .NET Reflector" and you have ReSharper 5 set to find the source using pdbs.
For reflector's addin to successfully open in reflector, resharper should be set to open in the object explorer. Of course you can make that your second option if you'd like resharper's pdb-based source code to appear when it's available.
Unfortunately, because reflector has to piggy-back on either Visual Studio or ReSharper's go to definition system, we can't make "Open in .NET Reflector" work even when resharper is set to open using a pdb file. I wish we could [image]
Also, I'm investigating whether this is still working at all since the final ReSharper 5 release. It may not be.
Cheers, / comments
Oh, I think you mean when you choose "Open in .NET Reflector" and you have ReSharper 5 set to find the source using pdbs.
For reflector's addin to successfully open in reflector, resharper should b...
Hi Paul,
Sorry for taking a while to get back to you.
Although it would be rarely used, that seems like a reasonable feature. Unfortunately, we won't have time to put it in for v5, but I've put it in the bug tracking system.
Cheers, / comments
Hi Paul,
Sorry for taking a while to get back to you.
Although it would be rarely used, that seems like a reasonable feature. Unfortunately, we won't have time to put it in for v5, but I've put it ...
The new build of the custom web server now accepts all users by default. / comments
The new build of the custom web server now accepts all users by default.
Thanks for the report about the trailing slash, I'll definitely make that optional.
You need to configure who has access to the web service in the web.config to make it work. You might find it hard without having a serial number. Perhaps I should make it allow everything by default. / comments
Thanks for the report about the trailing slash, I'll definitely make that optional.
You need to configure who has access to the web service in the web.config to make it work. You might find it hard...
We hadn't released the custom web service for v5 (they're incompatible).
Here it is: http://downloads.red-gate.com/EAP/Smart ... ervice.zip
I hope you'll be able to work out how to use it, it's more or less the same as the old one.
Cheers, / comments
We hadn't released the custom web service for v5 (they're incompatible).
Here it is:http://downloads.red-gate.com/EAP/Smart ... ervice.zip
I hope you'll be able to work out how to use it, it's more...
Yes, the maintenance plan will allow you to upgrade to V5 for no extra cost. You'll need to contact sales when v5 is released to get a V5 serial number. There won't be a license file anymore, the serial number will do its job.
I'll look into the trial web service right now, it should be working normally, thanks for the report.
Cheers, / comments
Yes, the maintenance plan will allow you to upgrade to V5 for no extra cost. You'll need to contact sales when v5 is released to get a V5 serial number. There won't be a license file anymore, the s...
A will always use the merged version, since once an assembly is merged into another assembly, it genuinely becomes part of that assembly, and it would be impossible for types to be resolved outside.
The console app will definitely not use the merged copy directly. / comments
A will always use the merged version, since once an assembly is merged into another assembly, it genuinely becomes part of that assembly, and it would be impossible for types to be resolved outside...
The only difference is that the "old" Reflector still worked when you didn't update.
Just to correct a factual point there, Reflector has always disabled itself one month after first asking you to update it.
The chances are you just updated it quickly enough that you never saw it disabled previously. / comments
The only difference is that the "old" Reflector still worked when you didn't update.
Just to correct a factual point there, Reflector has always disabled itself one month after first asking yo...
I've investigated the .NET 4 client profile as you asked, and it seems to work fine with smartassembly error reporting.
Please let me know if you don't find that to be true.
I couldn't get the .NET 3.5 client profile to work at all, whether or not I used smartassembly! / comments
I've investigated the .NET 4 client profile as you asked, and it seems to work fine with smartassembly error reporting.
Please let me know if you don't find that to be true.
I couldn't get the .NET...
Hi Alberto,
Here is a rough changelist for version 5:
- Improved usability throughout
- Made exception reporting available in trials
- Simplified product editions
- Simplified sharing exception reports
- Introduced option to keep IL strictly valid when using control flow obfuscation, which means Mono is still supported
- Improved viewing of inner exceptions and stack frames outside your code in exception reporting
- Support for Silverlight 4 (previous version worked, but had bugs)
- Fixed intermittent bug with string encoding with improved protection on x64
- Added ability to save exception reports as a file after automatic reporting fails in default exception handler
- Prevent a confused deputy attack on strings encoding
- Better handling of renaming assemblies that are merged
- Fixed bugs in pruning related p/Invoke calls
- Major bugs in highest obfuscation level fixed
- Various minor bugs in obfuscation and pruning features fixed
- Removed curly braces from file names
Regarding the .NET Framework Client profile, I hadn't read about it before. If I have time, I'll have a look to see whether it's easy to make exception reporting support it, but you understand I can't give it very high priority because since Windows Vista, a .net framework has been included with windows, so the client profile is obsolete.
Cheers, / comments
Hi Alberto,
Here is a rough changelist for version 5:
- Improved usability throughout
- Made exception reporting available in trials
- Simplified product editions
- Simplified sharing exception rep...