Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your post.
This is a good idea and it seems to be the first time anyone has suggested it to us. I've logged the feature request internally as SB-5557 to be reviewed by our development team.
I wouldn't expect a feature like this to be added any time soon, but it can at least be up for consideration now.
Your idea of writing a powershell wrapper sounds like a good workaround for the time being.
If you have any success, it would be great if you could post your script so other users with the same issues can make use of it. Seeing your script would also help us understand your requirements better, if the feature is ever implemented.
Regards, / comments
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your post.
This is a good idea and it seems to be the first time anyone has suggested it to us. I've logged the feature request internally as SB-5557 to be reviewed by our develo...
Thanks for your post.
I'm not really sure why this would be happening. There aren't any case sensitivity options that I'm aware of that would affect this.
Would you be able to send me an example script for an object that causes this?
What happens if you unlink your project and then relink? Does your client then report the case difference similar to your colleague? / comments
Thanks for your post.
I'm not really sure why this would be happening. There aren't any case sensitivity options that I'm aware of that would affect this.
Would you be able to send me an example sc...
Thanks for your post.
We've had a few requests for this feature over the years, but unfortunately it has never been scheduled into any future versions of the product.
There isn't any short-term plans for this to change, but I'll make sure it's considered for the next time we work on the product.
I really don't know when this might be, but it's unlikely it will be within the next six months.
Sorry, I don't have any better news. / comments
Thanks for your post.
We've had a few requests for this feature over the years, but unfortunately it has never been scheduled into any future versions of the product.
There isn't any short-term pl...
Thanks for your post.
Yes, you can automate your deployments using the SQL Compare command line. The easiest way is to use a Windows Scheduled Task.
The best way to get started is to read our documentation on using the command line interface. There are several examples that should help you set it up.
I hope this helps. / comments
Thanks for your post.
Yes, you can automate your deployments using the SQL Compare command line. The easiest way is to use a Windows Scheduled Task.
The best way to get started is to read our docum...
Thanks for your post.
I agree that the error message isn't very helpful in this situation.
I suspect that while the index is being rebuild SQL Server creates a temporary copy which gets flagged as a duplicate when SQL Compare stumbles across it.
I'm not sure how to test for that, as I don't really know what SQL Server does internally while rebuilding, or if there is any way to determine if this kind of operation is being performed and warn the user. / comments
Thanks for your post.
I agree that the error message isn't very helpful in this situation.
I suspect that while the index is being rebuild SQL Server creates a temporary copy which gets flagged as ...
Thanks for your post.
I'm afraid this isn't possible, but you might like to suggest it on our uservoice site.
We have the feature in our SQL Server version, just not in the Oracle tool. / comments
Thanks for your post.
I'm afraid this isn't possible, but you might like to suggest it on our uservoice site.
We have the feature in our SQL Server version, just not in the Oracle tool.
Thanks for your post.
Do you have the DDL for the (source and target) objects that cause this behavior? / comments
Thanks for your post.
Do you have the DDL for the (source and target) objects that cause this behavior?
Thanks for your post.
1. Team Foundation Service has been supported since SQL Source Control 3.1. You can find the documentation here.
2. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a good way to do this. See the following thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1077 ... svn-to-tfs
I hope this helps. / comments
Thanks for your post.
1. Team Foundation Service has been supported since SQL Source Control 3.1. You can find the documentation here.
2. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a good way to do thi...
That's great. If you're unable to do that, would you be able to send me (through the support ticket we also have open) a SQL Compare snapshot of the source and target schema and I'll try and replicate the issue here? / comments
That's great. If you're unable to do that, would you be able to send me (through the support ticket we also have open) a SQL Compare snapshot of the source and target schema and I'll try and replic...
Thanks for your post.
Digging a little deeper, I think there can be situations where SQL Compare will override the 'transaction isolation level' and default to 'serializable'.
It would be great to try it with your snapshots and see if it's doing by design in this situation, or if it's doing for the wrong reasons (bug).
You can create the snapshots through the SQLCompare UI. File > Save snapshot / comments
Thanks for your post.
Digging a little deeper, I think there can be situations where SQL Compare will override the 'transaction isolation level' and default to 'serializable'.
It would be great to ...