I've always used Smart Assembly to protect my work. I used to protect my programs written with Visual Basic .Net Framework 4.5 and 4.8. When examining the code with programs like ILspy, it actually looked very protected and confusing. I usually use almost all protections except Proxy.
Now I write my applications with .Net 9.2 and I don't know why they're not as protected as before. I mean, when I examine the code (for example, by using IL or C# (even though I know it's not C#)) in ILspy, everything appears quite clear. Sure, the strings are protected, you can't see the specific Forms, you can't see the methods, ok, but the code appears VERY logical, like you can guess everything. Couldn't this be solved? Thank you.
I've always used Smart Assembly to protect my work. I used to protect my programs written with Visual Basic .Net Framework 4.5 and 4.8. When examining the code with programs like ILspy, it actually looked very protected and confusing. I usually use almost all protections except Proxy. Now I write my applications with .Net 9.2 and I don't know why they're not as protected as before. I mean, when I examine the code (for example, by using IL or C# (even though I know it's not C#)) in ILspy, everything appears quite clear. Sure, the strings are protected, you can't see the specific Forms, you can't see the methods, ok, but the code appears VERY logical, like you can guess everything. Couldn't this be solved? Thank you.