Comments
5 comments
-
I like the terms you've chosen. They do seem very descriptive and modern. When I'm in this space I often hear the terms Data Access Management or Data Access Governance. (DAM and DAG respectively.) Is there benefit to using unique terms or industry standard terms? I know we got burned by leaning into DLM.
-
Thanks @robrich
We are running a webinar in March to test out the Continuous Compliance Automation messaging to see how it resonates with our wider audience:
Can Continuous Compliance Automation transform data protection in your organization? -
Hi Louise
I've seen a lot of over-complicated "data governance" frameworks implemented at companies so for me personally the "governance" term would put me off!
The main things I would expect the term to encompass would be masking, tracking of changes/deployments (i.e. Ben did an ALTER stored procedure on 1/1/2022), tracking of backups etc.
The perfect name will probably be clear after people have seen your webinar.
Not sure if "Database Compliance Automation" would be worth a shout if it is centered around the database?
cheers
Ben -
Thanks @ben_b this is really useful. Yeah we are running the webinar to test out the term and the wording, so will be good to see how it goes
-
In the cloud I have come across GCP Data Loss Prevention and AWS Macie.
The idea is that these scan your data sources for things that shouldn't be there whether that is PII data, security keys, sensitive identifiers etc.
Is that the sort of thing you are after?
These tools can be horrendously expensive so we use them where there really mustn't be sensitive data.
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
I'd like your honest opinions on something please
We have been looking at the messaging we use across our Database Privacy and Protection tools and I wanted to get your thoughts on what the terms Database Governance and Continuous compliance automation mean to you.
Thanks
Louise