Comments
6 comments
- 
                
                   I like the idea of Save/Save As to explicitly save projects. I occasionally compare databases that I do NOT want to create a "project" for. It's just a temporary one-time kind of thing. However, the dialog in previous versions was FAR superior in my opinion. I like the idea of Save/Save As to explicitly save projects. I occasionally compare databases that I do NOT want to create a "project" for. It's just a temporary one-time kind of thing. However, the dialog in previous versions was FAR superior in my opinion.
 I actually couldn't even find the recent projects drop-down in the new version at first. I expected the folder icon in the toolbar to open the same "Open File" dialog that the menu used so I didn't ever click it. That's not a huge deal because now that I know it's there I will use it, it just wasn't obvious at first.
 Also, I would like to see more than 6 projects in there. 6 is okay for a default, but I should be able to set the number I want to see and the drop-down should scroll if I have more than 6.
 Alternately, instead of a "Recently used projects" list, how about a "Favorites" list?
- 
                
                   A favorites list is a good idea. Would that be instead of a recently used list or in conjunction to it? A favorites list is a good idea. Would that be instead of a recently used list or in conjunction to it?
 It was always our intention to change the icon so that it's more discoverable. If you could pick a number (other than six), what would that be?
 Thanks!
 David Atkinson
 Red Gate Software
- 
                
                   I would keep the "Recently Used" list too. I would keep the "Recently Used" list too.
 I think you're going to have a hard time picking a number for "Recently Used" projects that will satisfy everyone. A user-defined setting would be much better. You could probably force the setting to be between 1 and 99.
- 
                
                   Personally, i prefer the auto save feature of SQL Compare 7 compared to the save/save as feature of SQL Data Compare. I don't like having to come up with unique names for each "project". I would rather have the tool keep track of that info and make it that much quicker for me. Personally, i prefer the auto save feature of SQL Compare 7 compared to the save/save as feature of SQL Data Compare. I don't like having to come up with unique names for each "project". I would rather have the tool keep track of that info and make it that much quicker for me.
 John
- 
                
                   Hi, Hi,
 The reason why we're moving away from auto-save is so that it is possible to tinker with project settings without losing changes that could have taken a significant amount of time to configure.
 In the actual release we're defaulting the name to:
 SourceDBName v TargetDBName.scp
 Keep the feedback coming!
 David Atkinson
 Red Gate Software
- 
                
                   If you provide a default value for the "project" then that is good enough for me! I don't like being forced into naming it myself, just give me the option if I need it. If you provide a default value for the "project" then that is good enough for me! I don't like being forced into naming it myself, just give me the option if I need it.
 John
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
We're looking to get some detailed feedback on this area and how/if this might work for you.
Thanks very much for any comments on this!
David Atkinson
Product Manager
Red Gate Software