This Beta is still a memory hog, but seems not to be so much of one. I'm using on large DBs, across multiple servers, and Physical memory is holding at 113k with virtual around 100k. Prior version would already have used double that. Also, it has a quicker response than the prior version.
dldlcd
0

Comments

1 comment

  • Lionel
    The reason that it needs so much memory is it caches a copy of the schema of the current database. We can't pull it down dynamically as it is just too slow. We are looking at adding some options to make large databases faster like excluding objects etc. Any sugestions gratfully recieved.

    Lionel
    Lionel
    0

Add comment

Please sign in to leave a comment.