First off, I had diagrammed the entire DB - not something you planned on us doing... However, once that's done and the initial Table and its immediate dependencies were selected, then "Invert", then "Hide", then "Layout: Circular" was applied, I needed to pull in another related table (a few hours of analysis and modification later, I'll add).
Having selected the table in the "Objects in Diagram" list, I added its immediate dependencies. It happened that the 2nd table was in a far-flung area of the diagram relative to the 1st table. The diagram duly morphed to show all the objects "visible". Being the icons looked ant-sized, I supposed that "Reapply Layout" might be the way to get them close together. The button was active, allowed me to click it, RGDT then wobbled the diagram like Jello for a few seconds, and left it as was... Rats!
So, after some Zoom to Fit, Zoom In, Zoom Out, manually trying to snag the tiny icons and move them myself, plus trying other Layout types, it finally submitted and morphed all 14 objects close to each other.
Perhaps there's a bit of a bug in the "Reapply Layout" that overlooks the distance between the sets of unconnected objects under analysis...?
Having selected the table in the "Objects in Diagram" list, I added its immediate dependencies. It happened that the 2nd table was in a far-flung area of the diagram relative to the 1st table. The diagram duly morphed to show all the objects "visible". Being the icons looked ant-sized, I supposed that "Reapply Layout" might be the way to get them close together. The button was active, allowed me to click it, RGDT then wobbled the diagram like Jello for a few seconds, and left it as was... Rats!
So, after some Zoom to Fit, Zoom In, Zoom Out, manually trying to snag the tiny icons and move them myself, plus trying other Layout types, it finally submitted and morphed all 14 objects close to each other.
Perhaps there's a bit of a bug in the "Reapply Layout" that overlooks the distance between the sets of unconnected objects under analysis...?