Comments
3 comments
-
Hi tuanhai1989,
Thanks for your post. We have a logged a ticket and will be in contact with you shortly.
Best Regards,
Steve -
Thanks for your post!
I see you corresponded with Dom about this on another post (http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=17205). As he mentioned, making your code more complex should allow control flow obfuscation to be more robust but we'll also be taking a look at de4dot--many thanks again for letting us know!
I just also wanted to note there are some cases where code is actually not obfuscated on purpose. For more details on this, kindly see here: http://documentation.red-gate.com/displ ... not-enough -
Thanks Jessica to reply me.
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
I used strongest level obfuscate
,then I used dot4net and it clean success, my source is viewable
sory I'm not good in English
I wish smartassembly will have rename method and variable like Confuser.