How can we help you today? How can we help you today?

Conflict of Interest : Reflector and SmartAssembly

In separate acquisitions - RedGate now owns both Reflector and Smart Assembly obfuscator.

One Question: How is developing both Reflector and Smart Assembly not a conflict of interest?

Thank you -

Ryan D. Hatch
rdhatch
0

Comments

1 comment

  • JDelekto
    rdhatch wrote:
    In separate acquisitions - RedGate now owns both Reflector and Smart Assembly obfuscator.

    One Question: How is developing both Reflector and Smart Assembly not a conflict of interest?

    Thank you -

    Ryan D. Hatch

    Greets,

    Having both a tool which 'decompiles' as well as a tool which obfuscates is not really a conflict of interest.

    If they added the ability to 'de-obfuscate' code into Reflector which had knowledge of their obfuscation would be more of a feature than it would be a threat; I say so because it would not require people using other obfuscators to have to drag and drop obfuscated stack traces into tools to see exactly where a problem exists. (If they even get that input.)

    Obfuscation is just that, it makes an assembly difficult to understand. Owning a tool which can decompile is usually thwarted by some obfuscation attempts --to the point it may cause them to crash.

    If you ask me, it sounds like a good marriage of products --a way to obfuscate code and a way to debug through the obfuscation. Of course, one would have to have: a) the PDB files; and b) a version of Reflector that could de-obfuscate.

    Cheers.
    JDelekto
    0

Add comment

Please sign in to leave a comment.