How can we help you today? How can we help you today?

Operator ++

instead of formatting source as

case 14:
return (structc5 = op_Decrement(structc5));

would be much better to decode as

case 14:
return ++structc5;

where structc5 is a local var on stack
alehandro
0

Comments

1 comment

Sort by
  • alehandro
    any comments here?

    OK, I'll show the code below (not compilable) and how I fixed it (after):

    before
    struct09c structc5 = structcArray[0];
    .......
    case 13:
    return (structc5 = op_Increment(structc5));

    case 14:
    return (structc5 = op_Decrement(structc5));


    after

    case 13:
    return ++structc5;

    case 14:
    return --structc5;



    struct09c is rather complex, but is has the operators:
    eg:

    public static struct09c operator ++(struct09c p0)
    {
    return (p0 + f0002c5);
    }

    public static struct09c operator --(struct09c p0)
    {
    return (p0 - f0002c5);
    }
    alehandro
    0

Add comment

Please sign in to leave a comment.