How can we help you today? How can we help you today?

cross-database dependencies

I'm not a customer yet -- just working with my 14-day trial.

Question: the release notes (for 1.3) and the product sheet state that SQL Doc "Includes all cross-database dependencies". What exactly is this referring to? Is this something that can be created/documented within the SQLDoc tool, or is it something that is set up in the database(s) and SQLDoc documents it? If the latter, how does one set up such dependencies?
RobSchripsema
0

Comments

3 comments

  • peter.peart
    Hi Rob,

    Thanks for your post.

    Can I confirm whereabouts you are looking for this information? The release notes for 1.3 ar ein the below link:

    http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/C ... SQLDoc.htm

    Either way, the tool will pull in external dependencies, i.e. where a sproc is retrieving data from a table in a different DB. This is something that the tool will document, but it will not implement it for you. Further information on setting up linked servers is available from the below link:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... 80%29.aspx

    HTH!

    Pete
    peter.peart
    0
  • RobSchripsema
    Pete,

    I found the information at the bottom of the following page (Version 1.3 release notes, I think):
    http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?p=26487#26487.

    My question is not with linked servers or stored procs, but the ability to note that, for example, a key/code field in a table in one database is actually a foreign key to a lookup table that is in a different database. I don't believe there is a way to denote this in the SQL schema itself; I was hoping (when I saw the 1.3 release notes) that there could be a way for me to note this in the documentation.

    I suppose I could just put it into the extended_property Description field as part of the field documentation, but I was hoping for something a little more sophisticated.
    RobSchripsema
    0
  • peter.peart
    Hi Rob,

    You could note this by altering the extended properties on objects within the DB if you wanted, and this would be classed as a schema update as you would be altering the MS_Description of an object.

    Would that suit your needs?

    Pete
    peter.peart
    0

Add comment

Please sign in to leave a comment.