Comments
2 comments
-
False 'text was encrypted' on a DEFAULT normally means that for some reason you can't read the sys.syscomments entry for that default. As another co-worker can read the tables fine, that sounds like a permissions issue (rather than a sys.syscomments table corruption issue, the other common cause). Can you check that you have the same permissions as your co-worker?
-
That was just the information I needed. I changed my permissions from datareader to dbowner and it works just fine.
Thanks so much, Michelle.
Add comment
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Anyways, I'm running 8.1.0.360 and when I compare these two databases I'm getting a lot of tables being identified as different. All table differences seem to be be showing the same kind of differences. Here is one such example:
Database A:
[HasBeenPrinted] [bit] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ReportFI_HasBeenPrinted] DEFAULT (0),
Database B:
[HasBeenPrinted] [bit] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ReportFI_HasBeenPrinted] DEFAULT -- Text was encrypted,
It seems to be pulling the schema correctly for Database A but it's giving that "Text was encrypted" comment on Database B. Like I said above, I know for sure that these databases have the same schema so this seems to be false positives. Also, since a co-worker has run this exact same project and and gets a return of identical schemas it leads me to believe that we can rule out Ignore, and Behavior options as a possible culprit.
Anyone have ideas on what could be causing all of the differences to be showing up when I run it as opposed to when someone else runs it?