Comments
Sort by recent activity
It looks like your mapping relies on the order of inserts matching the source DB, which can be tricky when dealing with shuffle operations. If the data gets shuffled or processed in parallel, maintaining the expected sequence might break. A good approach is to use a unique identifier or timestamp for ordering instead of relying on the default insert sequence. Speaking of mapping, this reminds me of how apps like Castle TV App organize and stream content. Just like SQL tables need proper indexing for efficient retrieval, streaming apps map content dynamically to ensure smooth playback without delays. If data isn’t structured properly, both in databases and streaming platforms, things can get messy fast! / comments
It looks like your mapping relies on the order of inserts matching the source DB, which can be tricky when dealing with shuffle operations. If the data gets shuffled or processed in parallel, maint...