Comments
Sort by recent activity
Robyn, thank you for reacting on this post. However, for several reasons, we have to migrate to .NET 8 by the end of the year. SmartAssembly not supporting .NET 8 is a blocker for us. Hopefully, the "architectural change" mentioned in one of the posts above will make supporting new .NET versions much easier and faster in the future. / comments
Robyn, thank you for reacting on this post.However, for several reasons, we have to migrate to .NET 8 by the end of the year. SmartAssembly not supporting .NET 8 is a blocker for us.Hopefully, the ...
Hello Victoria, that's great news, thank you! I'm looking forward to testing it in our environment. I assume there will be a hint on error similar as in the GUI, e.g. if the license server can't be contacted? Best regards, Michael / comments
Hello Victoria,that's great news, thank you!I'm looking forward to testing it in our environment.I assume there will be a hint on error similar as in the GUI, e.g. if the license server can't be co...
Hello Victoria, well, being able to verify the activation would certainly be an improvement to get notified that registration failed and has to be done manually. However, currently I'm more interested in finding out why the automatic registration does not work. Can I enable some additional switches to create a log file? As interactive registration works I wonder if the registration process is different from the process executed by the installer? Are there any other ways to find out why it is failing? Maybe a wireshark network communication log or something similar? Best regards, Michael / comments
Hello Victoria,well, being able to verify the activation would certainly be an improvement to get notified that registration failed and has to be done manually.However, currently I'm more intereste...
Hello Victoria, thank you for you answer, I will give it a try. Best Regards, Michael / comments
Hello Victoria,thank you for you answer, I will give it a try.Best Regards,Michael
Hello Victoria, is there a way to debug this if passing the license code using the RG_LICENSE option does not work? I can activate the license with the GUI client after installation and deactivating the license with the executable SmartAssembly.com works, too. The msi install log contains the passed properties, e.g. Property(S): REBOOT = ReallySuppress Property(S): RG_LICENSE = 123-123-123123-1234 Property(S): RG_I = Red Gate Software Ltd. The license code is just an example, on my machine I used the correct license code. *edit* I used the msi installer of the nuget package, if that matters. I created a new chocolatey package with that installer. Is there a way to use the nuget-package as is for chocolatey so I don't have to repackage it? How does the nuget-Package get the license key passed? */edit*
Best Regards, Michael / comments
Hello Victoria,is there a way to debug this if passing the license code using the RG_LICENSE option does not work?I can activate the license with the GUI client after installation and deactivating ...
Hello Victoria, thank you very much for your answer. Best Regards, Michael / comments
Hello Victoria,thank you very much for your answer.Best Regards,Michael