Comments
Sort by recent activity
Also tried direct connection connection "C:\Program Files\Red Gate\Schema Compare for Oracle 6\sco.exe" /source USER/USER_PASS@server:1521:service{SCHEMA}/snapshot C:\Agent1\_work\100\s\output\Target_SCHEMA_1.0.0.21.onpWith this I also get error Schema Compare for Oracle version:6.0.23.1366: activated, serial number: 389-739-884494-CF6E
Schema Compare for Oracle Command Line - Product version: 6.0.23.1366
Populating database
Error: ORA-01017: Message 1017 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA
70 / comments
Also tried direct connection connection"C:\Program Files\Red Gate\Schema Compare for Oracle 6\sco.exe" /source USER/USER_PASS@server:1521:service{SCHEMA}/snapshot C:\Agent1\_work\100\s\output\Targe...
Sry the command was wrong I needed to add a colon "C:\Program Files\Red Gate\Schema Compare for Oracle 6\sco.exe" /source:USER/USER_PASS@XE{SCHEMA} /snapshot C:\Agent1\_work\100\s\output\Target_SCHEMA_1.0.0.21.onBut there does seem to be an issue with TNS in Powershell As I now get Schema Compare for Oracle version:6.0.23.1366: activated, serial number: 389-739-884494-CF6E
Schema Compare for Oracle Command Line - Product version: 6.0.23.1366
Error: No TNS Entry for XE found, trying to connect using Oracle home
OraDB21Home1
Populating database
Error: Error while trying to retrieve text for error ORA-12154
70 / comments
Sry the command was wrong I needed to add a colon"C:\Program Files\Red Gate\Schema Compare for Oracle 6\sco.exe" /source:USER/USER_PASS@XE{SCHEMA} /snapshot C:\Agent1\_work\100\s\output\Target_SCH...
Perfect yes I did find these and it works, thanks [image] / comments
Perfect yes I did find these and it works, thanks
Hi Eddie The problem is not that the app or the commit fails, it reports that the commit it worked fine. While it in fact does not work fine and would fail. The git push would result in an error, one that the app is not reporting. So you would have a false sense of security, with the app saying that it is committed when it is not. The app does sort itself out later, but that would be even more confusing, as your commit is now missing from the list that it was in before. Thanks for your support, it has been escalated as a bug - 303839 / comments
Hi EddieThe problem is not that the app or the commit fails, it reports that the commit it worked fine.While it in fact does not work fine and would fail. The git push would result in an error, on...
Hi Eddie The issue is that the app shows this as a commit that passed. While behind the scenes the git push would fail. Thus we have a commit that definitely fails, but is reported as passing. Later the app sorts itself out and removes the commit, but this would also be confusing as the app would now just have a commit missing that was previously shown as passing. Thanks for your help, this has been escalated as a bug - 303839 / comments
Hi EddieThe issue is that the app shows this as a commit that passed. While behind the scenes the git push would fail. Thus we have a commit that definitely fails, but is reported as passing.Late...
I would say that this should fail with a warning. Something along the lines of SourceTree when you attempt the same thing in that app. [image] As the action is definitely a git error, one that is by design due to the branch policy. / comments
I would say that this should fail with a warning. Something along the lines of SourceTree when you attempt the same thing in that app.As the action is definitely a git error, one that is by design ...
Update The Source Control reset itself around 30 min later so it is synced now again, but it is still a bug as the app should not allow this process to complete and register it as completed. [image] It would be very confusing to a user to see that their commit is now missing. When it failed in the first instance and is now simply gone. Thus when you think you have committed you have not. / comments
UpdateThe Source Control reset itself around 30 min later so it is synced now again, but it is still a bug as the app should not allow this process to complete and register it as completed.It would...
Please can you provide more details as this feature does not seems to work. What is the rule you would use for this? It does not seem to stay put even if you put a rule into this box and save on running the compare it still performs the same way. / comments
Please can you provide more details as this feature does not seems to work.What is the rule you would use for this?It does not seem to stay put even if you put a rule into this box and save on runn...
The problem with this idea, and your comments is as follows
The schema compare finds a difference in the object
The objects are scripted out for update
The update does nothing as the objects are identical in Oracle
The schema compare finds a difference in the object
Starts all over again
Thus you have an endless loop. Therefor it is a bug, even if you don't think so, as an endless loop is by all definition a bug. / comments
The problem with this idea, and your comments is as follows
The schema compare finds a difference in the object
The objects are scripted out for update
The update does nothing as the objects are i...