Comments
Sort by recent activity
That's an interesting idea BNitsche, It's not presently possible to invoke the GUI application with a project predefined. The CLI has much more comprehensive support for programmatic interaction for authoring scripts. / comments
That's an interesting idea BNitsche,It's not presently possible to invoke the GUI application with a project predefined. The CLI has much more comprehensive support for programmatic interaction for...
What version did you try this with please graded? I tried the same before replying and it was unsuccessful, loading to the project page instead. / comments
What version did you try this with please graded?I tried the same before replying and it was unsuccessful, loading to the project page instead.
Thank you for submitting it for Microsoft's review AmitSri, based on past experience that is the most effective measure that can be taken. Additionally, more security vendors are unwilling to review based on the work of 3rd parties and will only accept review requests from affected customers such as yourself. All obfuscation software is periodically marked by automated protection patterns because bad actors often obfuscate their payloads to improve the odds it will bypass detection. The false positive typically only lasts a short time until they are updated. If you scan it with another security product that uses different patterns it likely won't be flagged. Your diligence is much appreciated; if you remain concerned please hold off on using at first while the patterns are updated and MS review. / comments
Thank you for submitting it for Microsoft's review AmitSri, based on past experience that is the most effective measure that can be taken. Additionally, more security vendors are unwilling to revie...
Hello jbottinger, I'm not sure ignoreMissingMigrations is what you need; it would have allowed flyway to continue if formerly applied migrations were missing. Whereas your implementation sounds more like you want to be selective about which migration are run against which targets. Depending on your preferred architecture, I'd recommend one of two approaches. 1. Keep your different entity models in different directories, independent of one another, they then can be executed in sequence. Because they are independent nothing is missing. This may result in duplicate files on disk, thought that may be a serviceable trade-off. 2. Environment specific config files This would allow you to define in your migrations what targets they should be applied to. This would require more time and effort on your part but no file duplication. Footnote: If you are looking for the functionality of ignoreMissingMigrations for other reasons, it's been superseded by the more flexible ignore-migration-patterns option which will afford you the same capability. / comments
Hello jbottinger,I'm not sure ignoreMissingMigrations is what you need; it would have allowed flyway to continue if formerly applied migrations were missing. Whereas your implementation sounds more...
Having not identified any major issues with .Net 9, we now consider it supported by Smart Assembly. / comments
Having not identified any major issues with .Net 9, we now consider it supported by Smart Assembly.
Hello FanGuogang, welcome! Your English is great and thank you for the question. If I understand correctly, your goal is to minimise the amount of script duplication across branches? / comments
Hello FanGuogang, welcome!Your English is great and thank you for the question.If I understand correctly, your goal is to minimise the amount of script duplication across branches?
Hello SupportiveGiraffe, Sorry to hear you've had difficulty. What tier is the product currently licensed at please? If it shows Community in the top left corner that would explain the behaviour you're seeing. Assuming you have a licence for this functionality, using the ribbon on the top right you'll be able to sign into your Redgate account, which will license the product. / comments
Hello SupportiveGiraffe,Sorry to hear you've had difficulty. What tier is the product currently licensed at please?If it shows Community in the top left corner that would explain the behaviour you'...
Hi DenisJCilliers, What objects are you seeing this on please? The setting in specifically for ignoring case differences in PL/SQL blocks as detailed here. / comments
Hi DenisJCilliers,What objects are you seeing this on please? The setting in specifically for ignoring case differences in PL/SQL blocks as detailed here.
Hi Dan_brannan, Some progress yes, it's still in sprint, the issue is now understood and the work to fix it is ongoing. We will update here and the release notes once shipped. / comments
Hi Dan_brannan,Some progress yes, it's still in sprint, the issue is now understood and the work to fix it is ongoing. We will update here and the release notes once shipped.
I'm afraid our devs haven't passed an opinion on it yet Dan, I'll raise it our next standup. / comments
I'm afraid our devs haven't passed an opinion on it yet Dan, I'll raise it our next standup.