Comments
Sort by recent activity
Has there been any progress on this as a feature request? Using System.Reflection.ObfuscationAttribute would simplify integration with SmartAssembly for simple use cases, like force include/exclude members from obfuscation. For example, I'd expect the following usages to implicitly map to SA attributes: [Obfuscation(Exclude = true, ApplyToMembers = true)] // --> [DoNotObfuscateType]
[Obfuscation(Exclude = true, ApplyToMembers = false)] // --> [DoNotObfuscate]
[Obfuscation(Exclude = false)] // --> nothing, behaves as if no SA attribute defined / comments
Has there been any progress on this as a feature request? Using System.Reflection.ObfuscationAttribute would simplify integration with SmartAssembly for simple use cases, like force include/exclude...
Has there been any progress on this as a feature request? Using System.Reflection.ObfuscationAttribute would simplify integration with SmartAssembly for simple use cases, like force include/exclude members from obfuscation. For example, I'd expect the following usages to implicitly map to SA attributes: [Obfuscation(Exclude = true, ApplyToMembers = true)] // --> [DoNotObfuscateType]
[Obfuscation(Exclude = true, ApplyToMembers = false)] // --> [DoNotObfuscate]
[Obfuscation(Exclude = false)] // --> nothing, behaves as if no SA attribute defined / comments
Has there been any progress on this as a feature request? Using System.Reflection.ObfuscationAttribute would simplify integration with SmartAssembly for simple use cases, like force include/exclude...