Comments
Sort by recent activity
This would indeed, be useful. It would also be good if this could be referenced, somehow, by apps. For instance. In Visual Studio, it is possible to say which compare tools are used to compare certain types of files. I would love to be able to add .dll to the list and have it open in reflector with a side by side comparison. That way, if, for some reason, we have lost the source for a particular library we've created, but we have multiple versions of the code. We can see what, essentially, has changed in that code. / comments
This would indeed, be useful. It would also be good if this could be referenced, somehow, by apps. For instance. In Visual Studio, it is possible to say which compare tools are used to compare cert...
caddzooks wrote:
Most of us are skeptical because many of us do not see Reflector as a viable commercial venture, *if* you are going to do as you say (e.g., your plan 'at the moment' - continuing to offer the current version free of charge).
I love what Lutz Roeder has done, but I see lots of ways that this application could be improved for developers in a way that many would be willing to pay for.
I'm glad that Redgate is committing to keeping the core of it for free and I hope that they will maintain the free version as well (fix bugs, keep it in line with current frameworks, etc).
I have already submitted some updates that I would pay for and I am excited to see what other folks would like to see it do.
Anyway, I totally see this as a viable commercial venture.
I agree about the UI thing. Get a better UI and integrate it with VS if possible. Even though many tolerate it, there are plenty that would pay for the better interface (if it really is better, that is). / comments
caddzooks wrote:
Most of us are skeptical because many of us do not see Reflector as a viable commercial venture, *if* you are going to do as you say (e.g., your plan 'at the moment' - continuin...
There are times when I would like to be able to have something like this on a usb stick and run it from someone's machine as a diagnostic tool, or something without having to install it. Particularly if there are company restrictions for installing software on some machines.
On the other hand, for my development machine, I would be ecstatic to have an installer that would simplify the process of adding and removing this software.
So, if you make an installer, that would be great, but I would like the option to still run (at least the free version) without an installer. / comments
There are times when I would like to be able to have something like this on a usb stick and run it from someone's machine as a diagnostic tool, or something without having to install it. Particular...