Comments
Sort by recent activity
Doh, I feel like a goober. Dunno how i missed that, but rereading the docs, it makes sense
Thanks
David / comments
Doh, I feel like a goober. Dunno how i missed that, but rereading the docs, it makes sense
Thanks
David
Great, I've been using SQL Backup for less than two months and have run smack bang into two bugs. [image] Never mind, hopefully the fixed version will be covered by our license to use 5.1.
I'll give the @exitcode & @sqlerrorcode example from soonyu a try.
David / comments
Great, I've been using SQL Backup for less than two months and have run smack bang into two bugs. Never mind, hopefully the fixed version will be covered by our license to use 5.1.
I'll give th...
Not really. What I expected was that the MAILTO and MAILTO_ONERROR to have been honored even though I specified an incorrect option, and the correct status code being returned to sql.
In this case I would have expected 3 emails, one for each of MAILTO, MAILTO_ONERROR directives and an alert from the SQL Server Agent because the job step exit code indicated the step failed.
David / comments
Not really. What I expected was that the MAILTO and MAILTO_ONERROR to have been honored even though I specified an incorrect option, and the correct status code being returned to sql.
In this case...
Cut and paste from the log file(20070726 043000 01.log) that corresponds to the failed backup.
SQL Backup log file
26/07/2007 4:30:00 a.m.: Error 516: Multi database operations cannot use MIRRORFILE option.
David / comments
Cut and paste from the log file(20070726 043000 01.log) that corresponds to the failed backup.
SQL Backup log file
26/07/2007 4:30:00 a.m.: Error 516: Multi database operations cannot use MIRRORFIL...
Some clarification, the job was reported as Failed in the SQL Backup Activity History window, but the SQL Server Agent reported the job as successful. / comments
Some clarification, the job was reported as Failed in the SQL Backup Activity History window, but the SQL Server Agent reported the job as successful.
Thanks for replying...
Yup pretty obvious. The mirroring ( with the compression ) is an awsome feature. We used to rely on the native backup tool in sql 7 ( just switched to 2005 in last week) and strugled with the 140Gb ( and growing) backup and being able to archive it to a backup server. Backup now all done in 3/4 hour verses 2+hours with the native tool and xcopy.
Is there a timeframe on the next release?
David / comments
Thanks for replying...
Yup pretty obvious. The mirroring ( with the compression ) is an awsome feature. We used to rely on the native backup tool in sql 7 ( just switched to 2005 in last week) an...