User profile for benhall

Hello, I'm sorry you have encountered an error with the application. In order for us to be able to reproduce this issue, could you please email me your current database schema and your current project file. We can then look at solving the problem. Thank you Ben / comments

Hello, I'm sorry you have encountered an error with the application. In order for us to be able to reproduce this issue, could you please email me your current database schema and your current proj...

0 votes

Hello, Thanks for the feature request. That is a good idea and I have added a note into our system to review for a later release. If you have any other suggestions, please let us know. Thanks Ben / comments

Hello, Thanks for the feature request. That is a good idea and I have added a note into our system to review for a later release. If you have any other suggestions, please let us know. Thanks Ben

0 votes

Hello, I'm really sorry for the delay in replying. Been trying to get head around your db structure. Could you please email me with your DB structure so we can discuss this offline. Thanks Ben / comments

Hello, I'm really sorry for the delay in replying. Been trying to get head around your db structure. Could you please email me with your DB structure so we can discuss this offline. Thanks Ben

0 votes

Hello, Thanks for your post. As I have mentioned in a previous post, the reason for 1.1 was to fix a few issues and not introduce any new features. Thanks for your comments, at the moment this isn't possible however we are looking at incorporating this into a later release. I have added a note into our system so we can review your suggestion at a later date. If you have any other feedback, please let us know. Thank you Ben / comments

Hello, Thanks for your post. As I have mentioned in a previous post, the reason for 1.1 was to fix a few issues and not introduce any new features. Thanks for your comments, at the moment this isn'...

0 votes

Hello Traci, Thank you for your post. All of the custom assemblies are built against a particular version of the SQL Data Generator Engine, if you built against 1.0, then you will need to rebuild against 1.1. In order for the user examples to work and compile, within Visual Studio you need to fix the references within the solution. This just requires you to reference the Engine and any other assemblies which have a yellow icon. After this you can compile and drop the built assemblies into the directory. As for the CodePlex samples, I have just uploaded all the assemblies rebuilt against 1.1 which you can download here: https://www.codeplex.com/Release/Projec ... seId=13347 You should now be able to drop these into your directory, overriding any existing generators. I hope this is OK, if you need anything else then please let me know. Thanks Ben / comments

Hello Traci, Thank you for your post. All of the custom assemblies are built against a particular version of the SQL Data Generator Engine, if you built against 1.0, then you will need to rebuild ...

0 votes

Hello Paul, Thank you for the feedback, it is much appreciated. 1) At the moment, setting a generator to 100% nulls is the only way. We have an item to look at this in a later version. 2) Like in 1, we understand this isn't great at the moment and we are looking at making it more understandable. However, using the other generators, such as RegEx, can provide you with this functionality. 3) On our numeric generators, we have two types of distribution. One is Random, the other is sequential. With sequential, you can set an increment value, this allows you to go 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 etc. If you look at the Business > IDs generators, you can see how we have used it. Does this answer your question? 4) Thanks, I've added a note onto the item that you have also requested this. It's useful to know where the demand is. 5) Like with 2, it would be more useful to have a generator which could do this. Two possibilities with this, one is write your own generator and upload it to CodePlex to share. The second, use a SQL Statement generator and as the sql statement use SELECT GetDate(). I hope this helps, if you need anything else please let me know. Thanks Ben / comments

Hello Paul, Thank you for the feedback, it is much appreciated. 1) At the moment, setting a generator to 100% nulls is the only way. We have an item to look at this in a later version. 2) Like in ...

0 votes

Hi Paul, Oh I understand. Yes, this has been mentioned before. At the moment, there isn't a way to do this, apart from creating your own generator. I'll add another note to the system. Thanks for the additional information. Ben / comments

Hi Paul, Oh I understand. Yes, this has been mentioned before. At the moment, there isn't a way to do this, apart from creating your own generator. I'll add another note to the system. Thanks for ...

0 votes

Thanks for the additional comments, I have made a note of all of them for reviewing for a later release. Thanks Ben / comments

Thanks for the additional comments, I have made a note of all of them for reviewing for a later release. Thanks Ben

0 votes

David, That was my initial thought as well, thanks for the reply. Ben / comments

David, That was my initial thought as well, thanks for the reply. Ben

0 votes

Hello, Thanks for your feedback. You should find that we parse a check constraint and convert it into a regular expression assigned to the column. Currently, there is no way to assign these values automatically to a weighted list, however I have added a requested into our system to consider for a future release. Out of interest, what would you assign the default 'weight' out these values to be? Thanks Ben / comments

Hello, Thanks for your feedback. You should find that we parse a check constraint and convert it into a regular expression assigned to the column. Currently, there is no way to assign these values...

0 votes

How can we help you today?

benhall

Comments