Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the suggestion. We are currently investigating the ability to ignore columns for 1.1.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the suggestion. We are currently investigating the ability to ignore columns for 1.1.
Thanks
Ben
Hi Dinesh,
Once again, thank you. It was discussed for 1.0 however we didn't have time to implement this. I will see if I have time to create this generator for our CodePlex project.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Once again, thank you. It was discussed for 1.0 however we didn't have time to implement this. I will see if I have time to create this generator for our CodePlex project.
Thanks
Ben
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the bug report. I've reproduced it and added it into the bug tracker. This should be fixed for 1.1.
If you find anything else then please let us know! Thanks for all of the comments.
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the bug report. I've reproduced it and added it into the bug tracker. This should be fixed for 1.1.
If you find anything else then please let us know! Thanks for all of the co...
Hi Dinesh,
We did consider this for 1.0, however involved a lot of work so it was left out.
Would you like this functionality to be part of the RegEx generator, or would you like a separate generator? Is there anything else you would like supported around this area?
In the mean time, we do have the Code Generator on CodePlex which allows you to write your own C# to generate data which could be useful.
I look forward to your response.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
We did consider this for 1.0, however involved a lot of work so it was left out.
Would you like this functionality to be part of the RegEx generator, or would you like a separate generat...
Hi Dinesh,
Thank you, it's an interesting idea. If I understand you correctly, you want to manually specify a multi-column unique constraint via the UI?
In the database it would be something like this:
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [NC_Relationship11_TwoUniqueConstraints1] ON [dbo].[Relationship11_TwoUniqueConstraints] ([one], [two])
I like the suggestion, I will add it to the list and see what we can do for a future release.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Thank you, it's an interesting idea. If I understand you correctly, you want to manually specify a multi-column unique constraint via the UI?
In the database it would be something like t...
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the feedback. I'll add this to the list to be considered for the next release.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the feedback. I'll add this to the list to be considered for the next release.
Thanks
Ben
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the feedback. We have added this suggestion into the bug tracker and it is currently scheduled for the 1.1 release.
If there is anything else you would like to see in the release, we would really like to hear your feedback.
If anyone else would like the command line commands mentioned, please contact me and I can send them to you.
Regards
Ben / comments
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the feedback. We have added this suggestion into the bug tracker and it is currently scheduled for the 1.1 release.
If there is anything else you would like to see in the releas...
Hi Dinesh,
Could you please clarify where you think the separator would be useful for large numbers.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Dinesh,
Could you please clarify where you think the separator would be useful for large numbers.
Thanks
Ben
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated.
1) That is a good point, thank you. I have added a bug into our tracker, this will be fixed in 1.1.
2) We are aware of this issue and it will be fixed in 1.1, however thank you for bring this to our attention again.
If you have any other feedback, either bugs or feature requests, we would love to hear them!
Once again thank you.
Ben Hall
Test Engineer / comments
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated.
1) That is a good point, thank you. I have added a bug into our tracker, this will be fixed in 1.1.
2) We are aware of this issue and it will...
Hello,
Thanks for your post. At the moment, we are not planning on changing the project file format.
I am interested in hearing why you would like a schema for the project file? Is there anything particular you would like to be able to do?
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
Thanks for your post. At the moment, we are not planning on changing the project file format.
I am interested in hearing why you would like a schema for the project file? Is there anything ...