Activity overview
Latest activity by benhall
Hello,
Thanks for your post. I haven't experienced this myself, could you please send me a screenshot and the CHM to Ben.Hall {at} Red-Gate {dot} com so I can take a closer look [image]
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
Thanks for your post. I haven't experienced this myself, could you please send me a screenshot and the CHM to Ben.Hall {at} Red-Gate {dot} com so I can take a closer look
Thanks
Ben
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your comments. This was discussed however at the time we felt removing the SQL Script was the core use-case, going forward we will consider opening this up more.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your comments. This was discussed however at the time we felt removing the SQL Script was the core use-case, going forward we will consider opening this up more.
Thanks
Ben
Hello,
Thanks for your post. Since IE7 (I think), there has been security settings around viewing CHM files from certain locations. Are you saving the CHM to a network path\drive? If so, Windows might block you viewing the document. If you save the file to a local drive, you should be able to view the document.
I think this KB explains the scenario: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902225
If you have any other questions, please let us know.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
Thanks for your post. Since IE7 (I think), there has been security settings around viewing CHM files from certain locations. Are you saving the CHM to a network path\drive? If so, Windows m...
Hello,
Thanks for your post and getting in touch. There is not a way to export the sql scripts from SQL Doc 2, however you can using SQL Compare and the Scripts to Folder feature.
SQL Compare can be downloaded from http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql_compare/
If you have any other questions, please let us know.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
Thanks for your post and getting in touch. There is not a way to export the sql scripts from SQL Doc 2, however you can using SQL Compare and the Scripts to Folder feature.
SQL Compare can ...
Hello,
I've just done a very quick test on adding a new table and regenerating documentation via the command line and the new table was included without opening the UI. It looks like this will work as your require, picking up any changes and including them in the documentation.
Have you experienced problems around this area?
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
I've just done a very quick test on adding a new table and regenerating documentation via the command line and the new table was included without opening the UI. It looks like this will wor...
Hi Steve,
It all depends on the severify level of your error. If you raise your between between 11 and 16 then we will stop generation. Any errors below are just information, as such we output the error but continue.
You can find out more information on MSDN - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa937483(SQL.80).aspx
For example, this will stop generation:
RAISERROR('Stop Generation',12,1)
Where as, this will just output a message:
RAISERROR('This is just some information',1,1)
I hope this helps.
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi Steve,
It all depends on the severify level of your error. If you raise your between between 11 and 16 then we will stop generation. Any errors below are just information, as such we output the ...
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in releasing this. I have just uploaded a new version onto the codeplex site.
Release 1.2: http://www.codeplex.com/SDGGenerators/R ... seId=17693
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in releasing this. I have just uploaded a new version onto the codeplex site.
Release 1.2:http://www.codeplex.com/SDGGenerators/R ... seId=17693
Thanks
Ben
Hi John,
Sorry for not replying, currently busy organising another project. I'm pleased you have resolved your issue [image]
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hi John,
Sorry for not replying, currently busy organising another project. I'm pleased you have resolved your issue
Thanks
Ben
Hello,
I think the issue you are experiencing is due to the way SQL Server handles committing the transaction. When in batch mode, we have multiple isolated transactions, because they only involve a small set of records you don't notice a delay when SQL commits the transaction.
However, if you are not using batch mode, because of the amount of data your are processing, SQL Server takes longer to complete the transaction commit, which is why you are experiencing this. Out of interest, how long is the wait you are experiencing?
Could I ask, why does batch mode not work for you?
Thanks
Ben / comments
Hello,
I think the issue you are experiencing is due to the way SQL Server handles committing the transaction. When in batch mode, we have multiple isolated transactions, because they only involve...
Hello,
Sadly, there isn't a way to increase the size of the textbox on the manual foreign key generator.
I've added a note into our system to look at improving in a future release.
Thanks for reporting this.
Ben / comments
Hello,
Sadly, there isn't a way to increase the size of the textbox on the manual foreign key generator.
I've added a note into our system to look at improving in a future release.
Thanks for repor...